From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-x242.google.com (mail-pg0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ymsW53jGDzDr8x for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:25:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pg0-x242.google.com with SMTP id e14so1121274pgr.9 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 23:25:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:24:58 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Petr Mladek Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Helge Deller , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , James Bottomley , Andrew Morton , Jessica Yu , Steven Rostedt , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Message-ID: <20171129072458.GA468@jagdpanzerIV> References: <20171109234830.5067-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20171128154710.ytqixlioc3hrcbl3@pathway.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20171128154710.ytqixlioc3hrcbl3@pathway.suse.cz> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On (11/28/17 16:47), Petr Mladek wrote: > On Fri 2017-11-10 08:48:24, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Hello, > > > > A reworked version. There is a new dereference_symbol_descriptor() > > function now, where "the magic happens", so I don't touch kallsyms_lookup() > > and module_address_lookup() anymore. > > The new version looks good to me. Thanks a lot for reworking it. > I feel much better now. For the whole series: > > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek > > > All Ack-s/Tested-by-s were dropped, since the patch set has been > > reworked. I'm kindly asking arch-s maintainers and developers to test it > > once again. Sorry for any inconveniences and thanks for your help in > > advance. > > I see that it was tested on all affected architectures. Thanks a lot > all testers. > > It seems that we are ready to go. I am going to push this into > for-4.16 branch in printk.git. thanks. -ss