LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [resend-without-rfc] powernv/kdump: Fix cases where the kdump kernel can get HMI's
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:53:00 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171208145300.3d7e3003@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171208033533.8014-1-bsingharora@gmail.com>

On Fri,  8 Dec 2017 14:35:33 +1100
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> wrote:

> Certain HMI's such as malfunction error propagate through
> all threads/core on the system. If a thread was offline
> prior to us crashing the system and jumping to the kdump
> kernel, bad things happen when it wakes up due to an HMI
> in the kdump kernel.
> 
> There are several possible ways to solve this problem
> 
> 1. Put the offline cores in a state such that they are
> not woken up for machine check and HMI errors. This
> does not work, since we might need to wake up offline
> threads occasionally to handle TB errors
> 2. Ignore HMI errors, setup HMEER to mask HMI errors,
> but this still leads the window open for any MCEs
> and masking them for the duration of the dump might
> be a concern
> 3. Wake up offline CPUs, as in send them to crash_ipi_callback
> (not wake them up as in mark them online as seen by
> the scheduler). kexec does a wake_online_cpus() call,
> this patch does something similar, but instead sends
> an IPI and forces them to crash_ipi_callback
> 
> Care is taken to enable this only for powenv platforms
> via crash_wake_offline (a global value set at setup
> time). The crash code sends out IPI's to all CPU's
> which then move to crash_ipi_callback and kexec_smp_wait().
> We don't grab the pt_regs for offline CPU's.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Nick reviewed the patches and asked if
> 
> 1. We need to do anything on the otherside of the kernel?
> The answer is not clear at this point, but I don't want
> to block this patch as it fixes a critical problem with
> kdump in SMT=2/1 mode
> 2. We should do this for other platforms
> The answer is same as above, other platforms require testing
> and I can selectively enable them as needed as I test them

Yeah I didn't intend those as a nack for the patch... It's
a bit annoying to have these selections between online cpus
and present cpus depending on kdump.

We don't want to do a full CPU online in the kdump path of
course, but what if the crash code has a call that can IPI
offline CPUs to get them into the crash callback, rather than
put it in the general NMI IPI code?


> @@ -187,6 +188,14 @@ static void pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self(void)
>  		WARN_ON(lazy_irq_pending());
>  
>  		/*
> +		 * For kdump kernels, we process the ipi and jump to
> +		 * crash_ipi_callback. For more details see the description
> +		 * at crash_wake_offline
> +		 */
> +		if (kdump_in_progress())
> +			crash_ipi_callback(NULL);
> +
> +		/*
>  		 * If the SRR1 value indicates that we woke up due to
>  		 * an external interrupt, then clear the interrupt.
>  		 * We clear the interrupt before checking for the

I think you need to do this _after_ clearing the interrupt,
otherwise you get a lost wakeup window, don't you?

Thanks,
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-08  4:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-08  3:35 [resend-without-rfc] powernv/kdump: Fix cases where the kdump kernel can get HMI's Balbir Singh
2017-12-08  4:53 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2017-12-08 11:46   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-12-08 13:19     ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171208145300.3d7e3003@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox