From: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
To: mikey@neuling.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 05/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Reclaim/recheckpoint on entry/exit
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:22:34 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180220002241.29648-6-cyrilbur@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180220002241.29648-1-cyrilbur@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 5 +++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h
index 471b2274fbeb..f904f19a9ec2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
* implementations as possible.
*/
#include <asm/head-64.h>
+#include <asm/tm.h>
/* PACA save area offsets (exgen, exmc, etc) */
#define EX_R9 0
@@ -127,6 +128,26 @@
hrfid; \
b hrfi_flush_fallback
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
+#define TM_KERNEL_ENTRY \
+ ld r3,_MSR(r1); \
+ /* Probably don't need to check if coming from user/kernel */ \
+ /* If TM is suspended or active then we must have come from*/ \
+ /* userspace */ \
+ andi. r0,r3,MSR_PR; \
+ beq 1f; \
+ rldicl. r3,r3,(64-MSR_TS_LG),(64-2); /* SUSPENDED or ACTIVE*/ \
+ beql+ 1f; /* Not SUSPENDED or ACTIVE */ \
+ bl save_nvgprs; \
+ RECONCILE_IRQ_STATE(r10,r11); \
+ li r3,TM_CAUSE_MISC; \
+ bl tm_reclaim_current; /* uint8 cause */ \
+1:
+
+#else /* CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM */
+#define TM_KERNEL_ENTRY
+#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM */
+
#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
#define __EXCEPTION_RELON_PROLOG_PSERIES_1(label, h) \
mfspr r11,SPRN_##h##SRR0; /* save SRR0 */ \
@@ -675,6 +696,9 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_CTRL)
EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON(trap, area); \
/* Volatile regs are potentially clobbered here */ \
additions; \
+ /* This is going to need to go somewhere else as well */\
+ /* See comment in tm_recheckpoint() */\
+ TM_KERNEL_ENTRY; \
addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD; \
bl hdlr; \
b ret
@@ -689,6 +713,7 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_CTRL)
EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON_3(trap); \
/* Volatile regs are potentially clobbered here */ \
additions; \
+ TM_KERNEL_ENTRY; \
addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD; \
bl hdlr
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
index 2cb5109a7ea3..107c15c6f48b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -126,6 +126,11 @@ BEGIN_FW_FTR_SECTION
33:
END_FW_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR)
#endif /* CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE && CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR */
+ TM_KERNEL_ENTRY
+ REST_GPR(0,r1)
+ REST_4GPRS(3,r1)
+ REST_2GPRS(7,r1)
+ addi r9,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
/*
* A syscall should always be called with interrupts enabled
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index 77dc6d8288eb..ea75da0fd506 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -951,6 +951,23 @@ void tm_recheckpoint(struct thread_struct *thread)
if (!(thread->regs->msr & MSR_TM))
return;
+ /*
+ * This is 'that' comment.
+ *
+ * If we get where with tm suspended or active then something
+ * has gone wrong. I've added this now as a proof of concept.
+ *
+ * The problem I'm seeing without it is an attempt to
+ * recheckpoint a CPU without a previous reclaim.
+ *
+ * I'm probably missed an exception entry with the
+ * TM_KERNEL_ENTRY macro. Should be easy enough to find.
+ */
+ if (MSR_TM_ACTIVE(mfmsr()))
+ return;
+
+ tm_enable();
+
/* We really can't be interrupted here as the TEXASR registers can't
* change and later in the trecheckpoint code, we have a userspace R1.
* So let's hard disable over this region.
@@ -1009,6 +1026,13 @@ static inline void tm_recheckpoint_new_task(struct task_struct *new)
static inline void __switch_to_tm(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *new)
{
+ /*
+ * So, with the rework none of this code should not be needed.
+ * I've left in the reclaim for now. This *should* save us
+ * from any mistake in the new code. Also the
+ * enabling/disabling logic of MSR_TM really should be
+ * refactored into a common way with MSR_{FP,VEC,VSX}
+ */
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_TM)) {
if (tm_enabled(prev) || tm_enabled(new))
tm_enable();
@@ -1016,11 +1040,14 @@ static inline void __switch_to_tm(struct task_struct *prev,
if (tm_enabled(prev)) {
prev->thread.load_tm++;
tm_reclaim_task(prev);
- if (!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(prev->thread.regs->msr) && prev->thread.load_tm == 0)
- prev->thread.regs->msr &= ~MSR_TM;
+ /*
+ * The disabling logic may be confused don't
+ * disable for now
+ *
+ * if (!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(prev->thread.regs->msr) && prev->thread.load_tm == 0)
+ * prev->thread.regs->msr &= ~MSR_TM;
+ */
}
-
- tm_recheckpoint_new_task(new);
}
}
@@ -1055,6 +1082,8 @@ void restore_tm_state(struct pt_regs *regs)
msr_diff = current->thread.ckpt_regs.msr & ~regs->msr;
msr_diff &= MSR_FP | MSR_VEC | MSR_VSX;
+ tm_recheckpoint(¤t->thread);
+
/* Ensure that restore_math() will restore */
if (msr_diff & MSR_FP)
current->thread.load_fp = 1;
--
2.16.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-20 0:22 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Deal with TM on kernel entry and exit Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] powerpc/tm: Remove struct thread_info param from tm_reclaim_thread() Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] selftests/powerpc: Fix tm.h helpers Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] selftests/powerpc: Add tm-signal-drop-transaction TM test Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] selftests/powerpc: Use less common thread names Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` Cyril Bur [this message]
2018-02-20 2:50 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Reclaim/recheckpoint on entry/exit Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 3:54 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 5:25 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 6:32 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Remove dead code from __switch_to_tm() Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 2:52 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 3:43 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Add TM_KERNEL_ENTRY in more delicate exception pathes Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Fix *unavailable_tm exceptions Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Tweak signal code to handle new reclaim/recheckpoint times Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Correctly save/restore checkpointed sprs Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 3:00 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 3:59 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 5:27 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Afterthoughts Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] [WIP] selftests/powerpc: Remove incorrect tm-syscall selftest Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 3:04 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 3:42 ` Cyril Bur
2018-06-13 22:38 ` [RFC,00/12] Deal with TM on kernel entry and exit Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180220002241.29648-6-cyrilbur@gmail.com \
--to=cyrilbur@gmail.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).