From: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
To: mikey@neuling.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Add TM_KERNEL_ENTRY in more delicate exception pathes
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:22:36 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180220002241.29648-8-cyrilbur@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180220002241.29648-1-cyrilbur@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 15 ++++++++++++++-
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
index 107c15c6f48b..32e8d8f7e091 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -967,7 +967,20 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_HAS_PPR)
bl __check_irq_replay
cmpwi cr0,r3,0
beq .Lrestore_no_replay
-
+
+ /*
+ * We decide VERY late if we need to replay interrupts, theres
+ * not much which can be done about that so this will have to
+ * do
+ */
+ TM_KERNEL_ENTRY
+ /*
+ * This will restore r3 that TM_KERNEL_ENTRY clobbered.
+ * Clearly not ideal! I wonder if we could change the trap
+ * value beforehand...
+ */
+ bl __check_irq_replay
+
/*
* We need to re-emit an interrupt. We do so by re-using our
* existing exception frame. We first change the trap value,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
index 3ac87e53b3da..c8899bf77fb0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
@@ -504,6 +504,11 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(data_access_common)
li r5,0x300
std r3,_DAR(r1)
std r4,_DSISR(r1)
+ /*
+ * Can't do TM_KERNEL_ENTRY here as do_hash_page might jump to
+ * very late in the expection exit code, well after any
+ * possiblity of doing a recheckpoint
+ */
BEGIN_MMU_FTR_SECTION
b do_hash_page /* Try to handle as hpte fault */
MMU_FTR_SECTION_ELSE
@@ -548,6 +553,11 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(instruction_access_common)
li r5,0x400
std r3,_DAR(r1)
std r4,_DSISR(r1)
+ /*
+ * Can't do TM_KERNEL_ENTRY here as do_hash_page might jump to
+ * very late in the expection exit code, well after any
+ * possiblity of doing a recheckpoint
+ */
BEGIN_MMU_FTR_SECTION
b do_hash_page /* Try to handle as hpte fault */
MMU_FTR_SECTION_ELSE
@@ -761,6 +771,7 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(alignment_common)
std r4,_DSISR(r1)
bl save_nvgprs
RECONCILE_IRQ_STATE(r10, r11)
+ TM_KERNEL_ENTRY
addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
bl alignment_exception
b ret_from_except
@@ -1668,7 +1679,9 @@ do_hash_page:
/* Here we have a page fault that hash_page can't handle. */
handle_page_fault:
-11: andis. r0,r4,DSISR_DABRMATCH@h
+11: TM_KERNEL_ENTRY
+ ld r4,_DSISR(r1)
+ andis. r0,r4,DSISR_DABRMATCH@h
bne- handle_dabr_fault
ld r4,_DAR(r1)
ld r5,_DSISR(r1)
@@ -1685,6 +1698,10 @@ handle_page_fault:
/* We have a data breakpoint exception - handle it */
handle_dabr_fault:
+ /*
+ * Don't need to do TM_KERNEL_ENTRY here as we'll
+ * come from handle_page_fault: which has done it already
+ */
bl save_nvgprs
ld r4,_DAR(r1)
ld r5,_DSISR(r1)
@@ -1698,7 +1715,14 @@ handle_dabr_fault:
* the PTE insertion
*/
13: bl save_nvgprs
- mr r5,r3
+ /*
+ * Use a non-volatile as the TM code will call, r3 is the
+ * return value from __hash_page() so not exactly easy to get
+ * again.
+ */
+ mr r31,r3
+ TM_KERNEL_ENTRY
+ mr r5, r31
addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
ld r4,_DAR(r1)
bl low_hash_fault
@@ -1713,7 +1737,8 @@ handle_dabr_fault:
* the access, or panic if there isn't a handler.
*/
77: bl save_nvgprs
- mr r4,r3
+ TM_KERNEL_ENTRY
+ ld r4,_DAR(r1)
addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
li r5,SIGSEGV
bl bad_page_fault
--
2.16.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-20 0:22 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Deal with TM on kernel entry and exit Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] powerpc/tm: Remove struct thread_info param from tm_reclaim_thread() Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] selftests/powerpc: Fix tm.h helpers Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] selftests/powerpc: Add tm-signal-drop-transaction TM test Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] selftests/powerpc: Use less common thread names Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Reclaim/recheckpoint on entry/exit Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 2:50 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 3:54 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 5:25 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 6:32 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Remove dead code from __switch_to_tm() Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 2:52 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 3:43 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` Cyril Bur [this message]
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Fix *unavailable_tm exceptions Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Tweak signal code to handle new reclaim/recheckpoint times Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Correctly save/restore checkpointed sprs Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 3:00 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 3:59 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 5:27 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Afterthoughts Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] [WIP] selftests/powerpc: Remove incorrect tm-syscall selftest Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 3:04 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 3:42 ` Cyril Bur
2018-06-13 22:38 ` [RFC,00/12] Deal with TM on kernel entry and exit Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180220002241.29648-8-cyrilbur@gmail.com \
--to=cyrilbur@gmail.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).