linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Check negative value returned by cpufreq_table_find_index_dl()
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:32:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180221100209.GP28462@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jEg7FELH6mBY16mB5sfo7s2mbH2SGheH4KVeKLnStjjg@mail.gmail.com>

On 21-02-18, 10:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> To be precise, ->init() should fail as that's where the table is
> created.  The registration fails as a result then.
> 
> But what if the bug is that ->init() doesn't fail when it should?
> 
> I guess the core could double check the frequency table after ->init()
> if ->target_index is not NULL.
> 
> The overall point here is that if you get a negative index in
> ->fast_switch(), that's way too late anyway and we should be able to
> catch that error much earlier.

I don't want to end up doing double checking as some of it is already
done at init, but let me check on what can be done.

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-21 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-12 10:21 [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Check negative value returned by cpufreq_table_find_index_dl() Shilpasri G Bhat
2018-02-12 10:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-02-12 10:33   ` Shilpasri G Bhat
2018-02-12 10:40     ` Viresh Kumar
2018-02-26  9:48     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-21  5:39   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-02-21  5:54     ` Viresh Kumar
2018-02-21  9:27       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-21 10:02         ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2018-02-21 10:17           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-21 10:19             ` Viresh Kumar
2018-02-21 13:13         ` Michael Ellerman
2018-02-21 13:25           ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180221100209.GP28462@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).