From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Fix oops due to wrong access of lppaca on non virtualized platform
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 17:41:03 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180402174103.4d122fb3@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180402073337.22568-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 13:03:37 +0530
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Commit 8e0b634b1327 ("powerpc/64s: Do not allocate lppaca if we are not
> virtualized") removed allocation of lppaca on non virtualized platform. But with
> CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR enabled, we do access lppaca non-virtualized platform in some
> code paths.
>
> Fix this but adding runtime check for virtualized platform.
>
> Fixes: 8e0b634b1327 ("powerpc/64s: Do not allocate lppaca if we are not virtualized")
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks, this looks good to me...
> ---
> Changes from V1:
> * update commit summary
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/lppaca.h | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 ++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/lppaca.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/lppaca.h
> index 65d589689f01..7c23ce8a5a4c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/lppaca.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/lppaca.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include <linux/threads.h>
> #include <asm/types.h>
> #include <asm/mmu.h>
> +#include <asm/firmware.h>
>
> /*
> * The lppaca is the "virtual processor area" registered with the hypervisor,
> @@ -114,6 +115,8 @@ struct lppaca {
>
> static inline bool lppaca_shared_proc(struct lppaca *l)
> {
> + if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR))
> + return false;
> return !!(l->__old_status & LPPACA_OLD_SHARED_PROC);
> }
>
We should eventually clean this up. There's no need to pass in an lppaca
here AFAIKS. Is it even per-CPU, does it change dynamically? We could set
it up in a FW_FEATURE parameter at boot, which would could make some of
these tests cheaper.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index b9ebc3085fb7..72dc4ddc2972 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
> #define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
> static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> {
> + if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR))
> + return false;
> return !!(be32_to_cpu(lppaca_of(cpu).yield_count) & 1);
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> index f7d96a68ecaa..360e71d455cc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> @@ -266,6 +266,9 @@ void accumulate_stolen_time(void)
>
> static inline u64 calculate_stolen_time(u64 stop_tb)
> {
> + if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR))
> + return 0;
> +
> if (get_paca()->dtl_ridx != be64_to_cpu(get_lppaca()->dtl_idx))
> return scan_dispatch_log(stop_tb);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-02 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-02 7:33 [PATCH V2] powerpc: Fix oops due to wrong access of lppaca on non virtualized platform Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-04-02 7:41 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2018-04-03 16:03 ` [V2] " Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180402174103.4d122fb3@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).