From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40H5TL6zWYzF1pD for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 00:54:43 +1000 (AEST) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 17:54:40 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, jasowang@redhat.com, joe@perches.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, elfring@users.sourceforge.net, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au Subject: Re: [RFC] virtio: Use DMA MAP API for devices without an IOMMU Message-ID: <20180405175326-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20180405105631.9514-1-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <3e1b113b-79ca-b700-5be9-10c66d74aabe@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3e1b113b-79ca-b700-5be9-10c66d74aabe@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:09:30PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 04/05/2018 04:26 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > There are certian platforms which would like to use SWIOTLB based DMA API > > for bouncing purpose without actually requiring an IOMMU back end. But the > > virtio core does not allow such mechanism. Right now DMA MAP API is only > > selected for devices which have an IOMMU and then the QEMU/host back end > > will process all incoming SG buffer addresses as IOVA instead of simple > > GPA which is the case for simple bounce buffers after being processed with > > SWIOTLB API. To enable this usage, it introduces an architecture specific > > function which will just make virtio core front end select DMA operations > > structure. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual > > + "Michael S. Tsirkin" I'm confused by this. static bool vring_use_dma_api(struct virtio_device *vdev) { if (!virtio_has_iommu_quirk(vdev)) return true; Why doesn't setting VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM on the hypervisor side sufficient?