From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40KYGp2sGNzDrpW for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:54:10 +1000 (AEST) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:53:56 -0400 From: Jerome Glisse To: Michal Hocko Cc: Laurent Dufour , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, Jonathan Corbet , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , "David S . Miller" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Vineet Gupta , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] move __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL in Kconfig Message-ID: <20180409145344.GA3285@redhat.com> References: <1523282229-20731-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180409140721.GI21835@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <20180409140721.GI21835@dhcp22.suse.cz> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:07:21PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 09-04-18 15:57:06, Laurent Dufour wrote: > > The per architecture __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL is defined statically in the > > per architecture header files. This doesn't allow to make other > > configuration dependent on it. > > > > This series is moving the __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL into the Kconfig files, > > setting it automatically when architectures was already setting it in > > header file. > > > > There is no functional change introduced by this series. > > I would just fold all three patches into a single one. It is much easier > to review that those selects are done properly when you can see that the > define is set for the same architecture. > > In general, I like the patch. It is always quite painful to track per > arch defines. You can also add Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse my grep fu showed no place that was forgotten. Cheers, Jérôme