From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64s: Fix CPU_FTRS_ALWAYS vs DT CPU features
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 12:26:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180413122654.7e38689d@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180412134751.25098-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au>
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:47:51 +1000
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> The cpu_has_feature() mechanism has an optimisation where at build
> time we construct a mask of the CPU feature bits that will always be
> true for the given .config, based on the platform/bitness/etc. that we
> are building for.
>
> That is incompatible with DT CPU features, where the set of CPU
> features is dependent on feature flags that are given to us by
> firmware.
>
> The result is that some feature bits can not be *disabled* by DT CPU
> features. Or more accurately, they can be disabled but they will still
> appear in the ALWAYS mask, meaning cpu_has_feature() will always
> return true for them.
>
> In the past this hasn't really been a problem because on Book3S
> 64 (where we support DT CPU features), the set of ALWAYS bits has been
> very small. That was because we always built for POWER4 and later,
> meaning the set of common bits was small.
>
> The only bit that could be cleared by DT CPU features that was also in
> the ALWAYS mask was CPU_FTR_NODSISRALIGN, and that was only used in
> the alignment handler to create a fake DSISR. That code was itself
> deleted in 31bfdb036f12 ("powerpc: Use instruction emulation
> infrastructure to handle alignment faults") (Sep 2017).
>
> However the set of ALWAYS features changed with the recent commit
> db5ae1c155af ("powerpc/64s: Refine feature sets for little endian
> builds") which restricted the set of feature flags when building
> little endian to Power7 or later. That caused the ALWAYS mask to
> become much larger for little endian builds.
>
> The result is that the following feature bits can currently not
> be *disabled* by DT CPU features:
>
> CPU_FTR_REAL_LE, CPU_FTR_MMCRA, CPU_FTR_CTRL, CPU_FTR_SMT,
> CPU_FTR_PURR, CPU_FTR_SPURR, CPU_FTR_DSCR, CPU_FTR_PKEY,
> CPU_FTR_VMX_COPY, CPU_FTR_CFAR, CPU_FTR_HAS_PPR.
>
> To fix it we need to mask the set of ALWAYS features with the base set
> of DT CPU features, ie. the features that are always enabled by DT CPU
> features. That way there are no bits in the ALWAYS mask that are not
> also always set by DT CPU features.
>
> Fixes: db5ae1c155af ("powerpc/64s: Refine feature sets for little endian builds")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-13 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-12 13:47 [PATCH] powerpc/64s: Fix CPU_FTRS_ALWAYS vs DT CPU features Michael Ellerman
2018-04-13 2:26 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2018-04-14 22:55 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180413122654.7e38689d@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).