From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] powerpc/64: Save stack pointer when we hard disable interrupts
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 16:26:40 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180505162640.06919112@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180502130729.24077-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au>
On Wed, 2 May 2018 23:07:26 +1000
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> A CPU that gets stuck with interrupts hard disable can be difficult to
> debug, as on some platforms we have no way to interrupt the CPU to
> find out what it's doing.
>
> A stop-gap is to have the CPU save it's stack pointer (r1) in its paca
> when it hard disables interrupts. That way if we can't interrupt it,
> we can at least trace the stack based on where it last disabled
> interrupts.
>
> In some cases that will be total junk, but the stack trace code should
> handle that. In the simple case of a CPU that disable interrupts and
> then gets stuck in a loop, the stack trace should be informative.
>
> We could clear the saved stack pointer when we enable interrupts, but
> that loses information which could be useful if we have nothing else
> to go on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 6 +++++-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> index 855e17d158b1..35cb37be61fe 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> @@ -237,8 +237,12 @@ static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)
> __hard_irq_disable(); \
> flags = irq_soft_mask_set_return(IRQS_ALL_DISABLED); \
> local_paca->irq_happened |= PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS; \
> - if (!arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) \
> + if (!arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) { \
> + asm ("stdx %%r1, 0, %1 ;" \
> + : "=m" (local_paca->saved_r1) \
> + : "b" (&local_paca->saved_r1)); \
> trace_hardirqs_off(); \
> + }
This is pretty neat, it would be good to have something that's not so
destructive as the NMI IPI.
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-05 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-02 13:07 [RFC PATCH 1/4] powerpc/64: Save stack pointer when we hard disable interrupts Michael Ellerman
2018-05-02 13:07 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] powerpc/nmi: Add an API for sending "safe" NMIs Michael Ellerman
2018-05-02 13:07 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] powerpc/64s: Wire up arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace() Michael Ellerman
2018-06-13 7:32 ` Christophe LEROY
2018-05-02 13:07 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] powerpc/stacktrace: Update copyright Michael Ellerman
2018-05-05 6:26 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2018-06-04 14:10 ` [RFC, 1/4] powerpc/64: Save stack pointer when we hard disable interrupts Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180505162640.06919112@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).