From: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf 6/6] bpf: fix JITed dump for multi-function programs via syscall
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 12:05:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517063548.6373-7-sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180517063548.6373-1-sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Currently, for multi-function programs, we cannot get the JITed
instructions using the bpf system call's BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD
command. Because of this, userspace tools such as bpftool fail
to identify a multi-function program as being JITed or not.
With the JIT enabled and the test program running, this can be
verified as follows:
# cat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
1
Before applying this patch:
# bpftool prog list
1: kprobe name foo tag b811aab41a39ad3d gpl
loaded_at 2018-05-16T11:43:38+0530 uid 0
xlated 216B not jited memlock 65536B
...
# bpftool prog dump jited id 1
no instructions returned
After applying this patch:
# bpftool prog list
1: kprobe name foo tag b811aab41a39ad3d gpl
loaded_at 2018-05-16T12:13:01+0530 uid 0
xlated 216B jited 308B memlock 65536B
...
# bpftool prog dump jited id 1
0: nop
4: nop
8: mflr r0
c: std r0,16(r1)
10: stdu r1,-112(r1)
14: std r31,104(r1)
18: addi r31,r1,48
1c: li r3,10
...
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 03c8437a2990..b2f70718aca7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1896,7 +1896,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
u32 info_len = attr->info.info_len;
char __user *uinsns;
- u32 ulen;
+ u32 ulen, i;
int err;
err = check_uarg_tail_zero(uinfo, sizeof(info), info_len);
@@ -1922,7 +1922,6 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
ulen = min_t(u32, info.nr_map_ids, ulen);
if (ulen) {
u32 __user *user_map_ids = u64_to_user_ptr(info.map_ids);
- u32 i;
for (i = 0; i < ulen; i++)
if (put_user(prog->aux->used_maps[i]->id,
@@ -1970,13 +1969,41 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
* for offload.
*/
ulen = info.jited_prog_len;
- info.jited_prog_len = prog->jited_len;
+ if (prog->aux->func_cnt) {
+ info.jited_prog_len = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->func_cnt; i++)
+ info.jited_prog_len += prog->aux->func[i]->jited_len;
+ } else {
+ info.jited_prog_len = prog->jited_len;
+ }
+
if (info.jited_prog_len && ulen) {
if (bpf_dump_raw_ok()) {
uinsns = u64_to_user_ptr(info.jited_prog_insns);
ulen = min_t(u32, info.jited_prog_len, ulen);
- if (copy_to_user(uinsns, prog->bpf_func, ulen))
- return -EFAULT;
+
+ /* for multi-function programs, copy the JITed
+ * instructions for all the functions
+ */
+ if (prog->aux->func_cnt) {
+ u32 len, free;
+ u8 *img;
+
+ free = ulen;
+ for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->func_cnt; i++) {
+ len = prog->aux->func[i]->jited_len;
+ img = (u8 *) prog->aux->func[i]->bpf_func;
+ if (len > free)
+ break;
+ if (copy_to_user(uinsns, img, len))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ uinsns += len;
+ free -= len;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (copy_to_user(uinsns, prog->bpf_func, ulen))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
} else {
info.jited_prog_insns = 0;
}
@@ -1987,7 +2014,6 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
if (info.nr_jited_ksyms && ulen) {
u64 __user *user_jited_ksyms = u64_to_user_ptr(info.jited_ksyms);
ulong ksym_addr;
- u32 i;
/* copy the address of the kernel symbol corresponding to
* each function
--
2.14.3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 6:35 [PATCH bpf 0/6] bpf: enhancements for multi-function programs Sandipan Das
2018-05-17 6:35 ` [PATCH bpf 1/6] bpf: support 64-bit offsets for bpf function calls Sandipan Das
2018-05-17 6:35 ` [PATCH bpf 2/6] bpf: powerpc64: add JIT support for multi-function programs Sandipan Das
2018-05-17 6:35 ` [PATCH bpf 3/6] bpf: get kernel symbol addresses via syscall Sandipan Das
2018-05-17 6:35 ` [PATCH bpf 4/6] tools: bpf: sync bpf uapi header Sandipan Das
2018-05-17 6:35 ` [PATCH bpf 5/6] tools: bpftool: resolve calls without using imm field Sandipan Das
2018-05-17 18:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-05-18 4:28 ` Sandipan Das
2018-05-17 6:35 ` Sandipan Das [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180517063548.6373-7-sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).