linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: Implement csum_ipv6_magic in assembly
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 14:55:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180524195538.GE17342@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1dac2356-5d8a-2892-109e-6e1b26c2bd8c@c-s.fr>

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:18:44AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> On 05/24/2018 06:20 AM, Christophe LEROY wrote:
> >Le 23/05/2018 à 20:34, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >>On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>>The generic csum_ipv6_magic() generates a pretty bad result
> >>
> >><snip>
> >>
> >>Please try with a more recent compiler, what you used is pretty ancient.
> >>It's not like recent compilers do great on this either, but it's not
> >>*that* bad anymore ;-)
> 
> Here is what I get with GCC 8.1
> It doesn't look much better, does it ?

There are no more mfocrf, which is a big speedup.  Other than that it is
pretty lousy still, I totally agree.  This improvement happened quite a
while ago, it's fixed in GCC 6.


Segher

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-24 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-22  6:57 [PATCH v3] powerpc: Implement csum_ipv6_magic in assembly Christophe Leroy
2018-05-23 18:34 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-24  6:20   ` Christophe LEROY
2018-05-24 10:18     ` Christophe Leroy
2018-05-24 19:55       ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2018-05-24 19:42     ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180524195538.GE17342@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).