linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH][RFC] [powerpc] arch_ptrace() uses of access_ok() are pointless
@ 2018-05-27 22:34 Al Viro
  2018-05-28 19:25 ` Mathieu Malaterre
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2018-05-27 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: linux-kernel, Michael Ellerman

make it use copy_{from,to}_user(), rather than access_ok() +
__copy_...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 22 +++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
index d23cf632edf0..d8b0fd2fa3aa 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -3081,27 +3081,19 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request,
 #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS */
 
-		if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, datavp,
-			       sizeof(struct ppc_debug_info)))
+		if (unlikely(copy_to_user(datavp, &dbginfo,
+				     sizeof(struct ppc_debug_info)))
 			return -EFAULT;
-		ret = __copy_to_user(datavp, &dbginfo,
-				     sizeof(struct ppc_debug_info)) ?
-		      -EFAULT : 0;
-		break;
+		return 0;
 	}
 
 	case PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG: {
 		struct ppc_hw_breakpoint bp_info;
 
-		if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, datavp,
-			       sizeof(struct ppc_hw_breakpoint)))
-			return -EFAULT;
-		ret = __copy_from_user(&bp_info, datavp,
-				       sizeof(struct ppc_hw_breakpoint)) ?
-		      -EFAULT : 0;
-		if (!ret)
-			ret = ppc_set_hwdebug(child, &bp_info);
-		break;
+		if (unlikely(copy_from_user(&bp_info, datavp,
+				       sizeof(struct ppc_hw_breakpoint)))
+		      return -EFAULT;
+		return ppc_set_hwdebug(child, &bp_info);
 	}
 
 	case PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG: {
-- 
2.11.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][RFC] [powerpc] arch_ptrace() uses of access_ok() are pointless
  2018-05-27 22:34 [PATCH][RFC] [powerpc] arch_ptrace() uses of access_ok() are pointless Al Viro
@ 2018-05-28 19:25 ` Mathieu Malaterre
  2018-05-28 20:30   ` Al Viro
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Malaterre @ 2018-05-28 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, LKML

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> make it use copy_{from,to}_user(), rather than access_ok() +
> __copy_...
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 22 +++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> index d23cf632edf0..d8b0fd2fa3aa 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -3081,27 +3081,19 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long =
request,
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS */
>
> -               if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, datavp,
> -                              sizeof(struct ppc_debug_info)))
> +               if (unlikely(copy_to_user(datavp, &dbginfo,
> +                                    sizeof(struct ppc_debug_info)))


Maybe this is just an RFC, but:

  CALL    ../arch/powerpc/kernel/systbl_chk.sh
../arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c: In function =E2=80=98arch_ptrace=E2=80=99:
../arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c:3086:4: error: expected =E2=80=98)=E2=80=99=
 before =E2=80=98return=E2=80=99
    return -EFAULT;
    ^~~~~~

Missing closing parenthesis.

>                         return -EFAULT;
> -               ret =3D __copy_to_user(datavp, &dbginfo,
> -                                    sizeof(struct ppc_debug_info)) ?
> -                     -EFAULT : 0;
> -               break;
> +               return 0;
>         }
>
>         case PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG: {
>                 struct ppc_hw_breakpoint bp_info;
>
> -               if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, datavp,
> -                              sizeof(struct ppc_hw_breakpoint)))
> -                       return -EFAULT;
> -               ret =3D __copy_from_user(&bp_info, datavp,
> -                                      sizeof(struct ppc_hw_breakpoint)) =
?
> -                     -EFAULT : 0;
> -               if (!ret)
> -                       ret =3D ppc_set_hwdebug(child, &bp_info);
> -               break;
> +               if (unlikely(copy_from_user(&bp_info, datavp,
> +                                      sizeof(struct ppc_hw_breakpoint)))
> +                     return -EFAULT;
> +               return ppc_set_hwdebug(child, &bp_info);
>         }
>
>         case PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG: {
> --
> 2.11.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][RFC] [powerpc] arch_ptrace() uses of access_ok() are pointless
  2018-05-28 19:25 ` Mathieu Malaterre
@ 2018-05-28 20:30   ` Al Viro
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2018-05-28 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mathieu Malaterre; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, LKML


> Maybe this is just an RFC, but:
> 
>   CALL    ../arch/powerpc/kernel/systbl_chk.sh
> ../arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c: In function ‘arch_ptrace’:
> ../arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c:3086:4: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘return’
>     return -EFAULT;
>     ^~~~~~

and the same a few lines later.  What's more, those 'unlikely' are pointless
there.  Fixed variant follows; only build-tested, though.

make it use copy_{from,to}_user(), rather than access_ok() +
__copy_...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 22 +++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
index d23cf632edf0..f557322621e0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -3081,27 +3081,19 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request,
 #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS */
 
-		if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, datavp,
-			       sizeof(struct ppc_debug_info)))
+		if (copy_to_user(datavp, &dbginfo,
+				     sizeof(struct ppc_debug_info)))
 			return -EFAULT;
-		ret = __copy_to_user(datavp, &dbginfo,
-				     sizeof(struct ppc_debug_info)) ?
-		      -EFAULT : 0;
-		break;
+		return 0;
 	}
 
 	case PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG: {
 		struct ppc_hw_breakpoint bp_info;
 
-		if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, datavp,
-			       sizeof(struct ppc_hw_breakpoint)))
-			return -EFAULT;
-		ret = __copy_from_user(&bp_info, datavp,
-				       sizeof(struct ppc_hw_breakpoint)) ?
-		      -EFAULT : 0;
-		if (!ret)
-			ret = ppc_set_hwdebug(child, &bp_info);
-		break;
+		if (copy_from_user(&bp_info, datavp,
+				       sizeof(struct ppc_hw_breakpoint)))
+		      return -EFAULT;
+		return ppc_set_hwdebug(child, &bp_info);
 	}
 
 	case PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG: {
-- 
2.11.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-28 20:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-27 22:34 [PATCH][RFC] [powerpc] arch_ptrace() uses of access_ok() are pointless Al Viro
2018-05-28 19:25 ` Mathieu Malaterre
2018-05-28 20:30   ` Al Viro

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).