From: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] powerpc/64: enhance memcmp() with VMX instruction for long bytes comparision
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 16:15:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180530081533.GC5951@simonLocalRHEL7.x64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fu2c3s9q.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Hi Michael,
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 09:59:29PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> wei.guo.simon@gmail.com writes:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S
> > index f20e883..4ba7bb6 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S
> > @@ -174,6 +235,13 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp)
> > blr
> >
> > .Llong:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
> > + /* Try to use vmx loop if length is equal or greater than 4K */
> > + cmpldi cr6,r5,VMX_THRESH
> > + bge cr6,.Lsameoffset_vmx_cmp
> > +
>
> Here we decide to use vmx, but we don't do any CPU feature checks.
>
>
> > @@ -332,7 +400,94 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp)
> > 8:
> > blr
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
> > +.Lsameoffset_vmx_cmp:
> > + /* Enter with src/dst addrs has the same offset with 8 bytes
> > + * align boundary
> > + */
> > + ENTER_VMX_OPS
> > + beq cr1,.Llong_novmx_cmp
> > +
> > +3:
> > + /* need to check whether r4 has the same offset with r3
> > + * for 16 bytes boundary.
> > + */
> > + xor r0,r3,r4
> > + andi. r0,r0,0xf
> > + bne .Ldiffoffset_vmx_cmp_start
> > +
> > + /* len is no less than 4KB. Need to align with 16 bytes further.
> > + */
> > + andi. rA,r3,8
> > + LD rA,0,r3
> > + beq 4f
> > + LD rB,0,r4
> > + cmpld cr0,rA,rB
> > + addi r3,r3,8
> > + addi r4,r4,8
> > + addi r5,r5,-8
> > +
> > + beq cr0,4f
> > + /* save and restore cr0 */
> > + mfocrf r5,64
> > + EXIT_VMX_OPS
> > + mtocrf 64,r5
> > + b .LcmpAB_lightweight
> > +
> > +4:
> > + /* compare 32 bytes for each loop */
> > + srdi r0,r5,5
> > + mtctr r0
> > + clrldi r5,r5,59
> > + li off16,16
> > +
> > +.balign 16
> > +5:
> > + lvx v0,0,r3
> > + lvx v1,0,r4
> > + vcmpequd. v0,v0,v1
>
> vcmpequd is only available on Power8 and later CPUs.
>
> Which means this will crash on Power7 or earlier.
>
> Something like this should fix it I think.
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S
> index 96eb08b2be2e..0a11ff14dcd9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S
> @@ -236,9 +236,11 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp)
>
> .Llong:
> #ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
> +BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
> /* Try to use vmx loop if length is equal or greater than 4K */
> cmpldi cr6,r5,VMX_THRESH
> bge cr6,.Lsameoffset_vmx_cmp
> +END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>
> .Llong_novmx_cmp:
> #endif
Thanks for the good catch! I will update that.
>
>
> There's another problem which is that old toolchains don't know about
> vcmpequd. To fix that we'll need to add a macro that uses .long to
> construct the instruction.
Right. I will add the corresponding macros.
Thanks for your review.
BR,
- Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-30 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-25 4:07 [PATCH v6 0/4] powerpc/64: memcmp() optimization wei.guo.simon
2018-05-25 4:07 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] powerpc/64: Align bytes before fall back to .Lshort in powerpc64 memcmp() wei.guo.simon
2018-05-28 10:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-30 8:11 ` Simon Guo
2018-05-30 8:27 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-30 9:02 ` Simon Guo
2018-05-25 4:07 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] powerpc/64: enhance memcmp() with VMX instruction for long bytes comparision wei.guo.simon
2018-05-28 11:05 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-30 8:14 ` Simon Guo
2018-05-30 8:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-30 9:03 ` Simon Guo
2018-06-06 6:42 ` Simon Guo
2018-06-06 20:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-28 11:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-05-30 8:15 ` Simon Guo [this message]
2018-05-25 4:07 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] powerpc/64: add 32 bytes prechecking before using VMX optimization on memcmp() wei.guo.simon
2018-05-25 4:07 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] powerpc:selftest update memcmp_64 selftest for VMX implementation wei.guo.simon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180530081533.GC5951@simonLocalRHEL7.x64 \
--to=wei.guo.simon@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrilbur@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).