From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4126265C92zF33h for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 12:34:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w582TGFe141930 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 22:34:52 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2jfdwredhk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 22:34:51 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 03:34:49 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 19:34:41 -0700 From: Ram Pai To: Florian Weimer Cc: Linux-MM , linuxppc-dev , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen Subject: Re: pkeys on POWER: Access rights not reset on execve Reply-To: Ram Pai References: <20180520060425.GL5479@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> <20180520191115.GM5479@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> <20180603201832.GA10109@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> <4e53b91f-80a7-816a-3e9b-56d7be7cd092@redhat.com> <20180604140135.GA10088@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> <20180604190229.GB10088@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> <30040030-1aa2-623b-beec-dd1ceb3eb9a7@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <30040030-1aa2-623b-beec-dd1ceb3eb9a7@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180608023441.GA5573@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > So the remaining question at this point is whether the Intel > behavior (default-deny instead of default-allow) is preferable. Florian, remind me what behavior needs to fixed? -- Ram Pai