From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-x244.google.com (mail-pf0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 415mZK2TpgzF09q for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:42:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id c22-v6so2365664pfi.2 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:41:44 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin To: Ricardo Neri Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Ashok Raj , Borislav Petkov , Tony Luck , "Ravi V. Shankar" , x86@kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jacob Pan , Don Zickus , Michael Ellerman , Frederic Weisbecker , Babu Moger , "David S. Miller" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Mathieu Desnoyers , Masami Hiramatsu , Andrew Morton , Philippe Ombredanne , Colin Ian King , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/23] watchdog/hardlockup: Decouple the hardlockup detector from perf Message-ID: <20180614114144.05891a04@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20180614011901.GA22652@voyager> References: <1528851463-21140-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <1528851463-21140-15-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20180613084324.GU12258@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180614011901.GA22652@voyager> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:19:01 -0700 Ricardo Neri wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 05:57:34PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote: > > > The current default implementation of the hardlockup detector assumes that > > > it is implemented using perf events. > > > > The sparc and powerpc things are very much not using perf. > > Isn't it true that the current hardlockup detector > (under kernel/watchdog_hld.c) is based on perf? arch/powerpc/kernel/watchdog.c is a powerpc implementation that uses the kernel/watchdog_hld.c framework. > As far as I understand, > this hardlockup detector is constructed using perf events for architectures > that don't provide an NMI watchdog. Perhaps I can be more specific and say > that this synthetized detector is based on perf. The perf detector is like that, but we want NMI watchdogs to share the watchdog_hld code as much as possible even for arch specific NMI watchdogs, so that kernel and user interfaces and behaviour are consistent. Other arch watchdogs like sparc are a little older so they are not using HLD. You don't have to change those for your series, but it would be good to bring them into the fold if possible at some time. IIRC sparc was slightly non-trivial because it has some differences in sysctl or cmdline APIs that we don't want to break. But powerpc at least needs to be updated if you change hld apis. Thanks, Nick