From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41BVBD0rZ4zF0wq for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 04:10:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w5LI9YEU018119 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:10:57 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2jrdyrgfhk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:10:56 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:10:55 +0100 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:10:45 -0700 From: Ram Pai To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Florian Weimer , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com, luto@kernel.org, msuchanek@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc/pkeys: fixes to pkeys Reply-To: Ram Pai References: <1528936144-6696-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <8812c879-5761-ef62-dd15-3ceef46d9653@redhat.com> <874lhzx84e.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <34669c66-ce2f-e8a0-1d18-43086bad3faa@redhat.com> <878t78fn6o.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <878t78fn6o.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Message-Id: <20180621181045.GL5294@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 08:28:47PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Florian Weimer writes: > > > On 06/19/2018 02:40 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >>> I tested the whole series with the new selftests, with the printamr.c > >>> program I posted earlier, and the glibc test for pkey_alloc &c. The > >>> latter required some test fixes, but now passes as well. As far as I > >>> can tell, everything looks good now. > >>> > >>> Tested-By: Florian Weimer > >> Thanks. I'll add that to each patch I guess, if you're happy with that? > > > > Sure, but I only tested the whole series as a whole. > > Yeah OK. We don't have a good way to express that, other than using a > merge which I'd prefer to avoid. > > So I've tagged them all with your Tested-by. If any of them turn out to > have bugs you can blame me :) I just tested the patches incrementally using the pkey selftests. So I feel confident these patches are not bugs. I will take the blame if the blame lands on Mpe :) RP