From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: npiggin@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/mm/nv/hash: Reduce contention on hpte lock
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:06:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180629083631.28017-3-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180629083631.28017-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
We do this in some part. This patch make sure we always try to search for
hpte without holding lock and redo the compare with lock held once match found.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c
index 68e6eaf41bb9..ffbd5ed4e8de 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c
@@ -568,9 +568,19 @@ static void native_hpte_invalidate(unsigned long slot, unsigned long vpn,
DBG_LOW(" invalidate(vpn=%016lx, hash: %lx)\n", vpn, slot);
want_v = hpte_encode_avpn(vpn, bpsize, ssize);
- native_lock_hpte(hptep);
hpte_v = hpte_get_old_v(hptep);
+ if (HPTE_V_COMPARE(hpte_v, want_v) && (hpte_v & HPTE_V_VALID)) {
+ native_lock_hpte(hptep);
+ /* recheck with locks held */
+ hpte_v = hpte_get_old_v(hptep);
+
+ if (HPTE_V_COMPARE(hpte_v, want_v) && (hpte_v & HPTE_V_VALID))
+ /* Invalidate the hpte. NOTE: this also unlocks it */
+ hptep->v = 0;
+ else
+ native_unlock_hpte(hptep);
+ }
/*
* We need to invalidate the TLB always because hpte_remove doesn't do
* a tlb invalidate. If a hash bucket gets full, we "evict" a more/less
@@ -578,13 +588,6 @@ static void native_hpte_invalidate(unsigned long slot, unsigned long vpn,
* (hpte_remove) because we assume the old translation is still
* technically "valid".
*/
- if (!HPTE_V_COMPARE(hpte_v, want_v) || !(hpte_v & HPTE_V_VALID))
- native_unlock_hpte(hptep);
- else
- /* Invalidate the hpte. NOTE: this also unlocks it */
- hptep->v = 0;
-
- /* Invalidate the TLB */
tlbie(vpn, bpsize, apsize, ssize, local);
local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -626,15 +629,23 @@ static void native_hugepage_invalidate(unsigned long vsid,
hptep = htab_address + slot;
want_v = hpte_encode_avpn(vpn, psize, ssize);
- native_lock_hpte(hptep);
hpte_v = hpte_get_old_v(hptep);
/* Even if we miss, we need to invalidate the TLB */
- if (!HPTE_V_COMPARE(hpte_v, want_v) || !(hpte_v & HPTE_V_VALID))
- native_unlock_hpte(hptep);
- else
- /* Invalidate the hpte. NOTE: this also unlocks it */
- hptep->v = 0;
+ if (HPTE_V_COMPARE(hpte_v, want_v) && (hpte_v & HPTE_V_VALID)) {
+ /* recheck with locks held */
+ native_lock_hpte(hptep);
+ hpte_v = hpte_get_old_v(hptep);
+
+ if (HPTE_V_COMPARE(hpte_v, want_v) && (hpte_v & HPTE_V_VALID)) {
+ /*
+ * Invalidate the hpte. NOTE: this also unlocks it
+ */
+
+ hptep->v = 0;
+ } else
+ native_unlock_hpte(hptep);
+ }
/*
* We need to do tlb invalidate for all the address, tlbie
* instruction compares entry_VA in tlb with the VA specified
@@ -802,13 +813,19 @@ static void native_flush_hash_range(unsigned long number, int local)
slot += hidx & _PTEIDX_GROUP_IX;
hptep = htab_address + slot;
want_v = hpte_encode_avpn(vpn, psize, ssize);
+ hpte_v = hpte_get_old_v(hptep);
+
+ if (!HPTE_V_COMPARE(hpte_v, want_v) || !(hpte_v & HPTE_V_VALID))
+ continue;
+ /* lock and try again */
native_lock_hpte(hptep);
hpte_v = hpte_get_old_v(hptep);
- if (!HPTE_V_COMPARE(hpte_v, want_v) ||
- !(hpte_v & HPTE_V_VALID))
+
+ if (!HPTE_V_COMPARE(hpte_v, want_v) || !(hpte_v & HPTE_V_VALID))
native_unlock_hpte(hptep);
else
hptep->v = 0;
+
} pte_iterate_hashed_end();
}
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-29 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-29 8:36 [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/mm/hash: Remove the superfluous bitwise operation when find hpte group Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-06-29 8:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/mm/hash: Add hpte_get_old_v and use that instead of opencoding Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-06-29 8:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2018-07-24 13:59 ` [1/3] powerpc/mm/hash: Remove the superfluous bitwise operation when find hpte group Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180629083631.28017-3-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).