linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: mpc5200: Remove VLA usage
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:16:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180702171631.GA16221@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fu12mnf7.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 11:33:32AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> What if we write it:
> 
>        char saved_0x500[0x600 - 0x500];
> 
> Hopefully the compiler is smart enough not to generate a VLA for that :)

It is a VLA if the array size is not an integer constant expression.  This
is defined by C; the compiler has nothing to do with it.  0x600-0x500 is
an integer constant expression, so this is not a VLA.

But if you meant if GCC will ever do a dynamic stack allocation for a fixed
size local variable: yes indeed, I hope not!

(Sometimes GCC can avoid this even with VLAs; but in this example we do
not even have a VLA, so it's easier than that :-) )


Segher

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-02 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-29 18:53 [PATCH] powerpc: mpc5200: Remove VLA usage Kees Cook
2018-06-29 21:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-06-29 21:44   ` Kees Cook
2018-07-02  1:33     ` Michael Ellerman
2018-07-02 15:52       ` Kees Cook
2018-07-02 17:16       ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2018-07-03  1:41         ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180702171631.GA16221@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=agust@denx.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).