From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: msuchanek@suse.de, anton@samba.org, npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc64s: Show ori31 availability in spectre_v1 sysfs file not v2
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:25:21 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180709062521.693-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
When I added the spectre_v2 information in sysfs, I included the
availability of the ori31 speculation barrier.
Although the ori31 barrier can be used to mitigate v2, it's primarily
intended as a spectre v1 mitigation. Spectre v2 is mitigated by
hardware changes.
So rework the sysfs files to show the ori31 information in the
spectre_v1 file, rather than v2.
Currently we display eg:
$ grep . spectre_v*
spectre_v1:Mitigation: __user pointer sanitization
spectre_v2:Mitigation: Indirect branch cache disabled, ori31 speculation barrier enabled
After:
$ grep . spectre_v*
spectre_v1:Mitigation: __user pointer sanitization, ori31 speculation barrier enabled
spectre_v2:Mitigation: Indirect branch cache disabled
Fixes: d6fbe1c55c55 ("powerpc/64s: Wire up cpu_show_spectre_v2()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.17+
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c
index a8b277362931..4cb8f1f7b593 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c
@@ -117,25 +117,35 @@ ssize_t cpu_show_meltdown(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, cha
ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v1(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
- if (!security_ftr_enabled(SEC_FTR_BNDS_CHK_SPEC_BAR))
- return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n");
+ struct seq_buf s;
+
+ seq_buf_init(&s, buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1);
- if (barrier_nospec_enabled)
- return sprintf(buf, "Mitigation: __user pointer sanitization\n");
+ if (security_ftr_enabled(SEC_FTR_BNDS_CHK_SPEC_BAR)) {
+ if (barrier_nospec_enabled)
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, "Mitigation: __user pointer sanitization");
+ else
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, "Vulnerable");
- return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable\n");
+ if (security_ftr_enabled(SEC_FTR_SPEC_BAR_ORI31))
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, ", ori31 speculation barrier enabled");
+
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, "\n");
+ } else
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, "Not affected\n");
+
+ return s.len;
}
ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
- bool bcs, ccd, ori;
struct seq_buf s;
+ bool bcs, ccd;
seq_buf_init(&s, buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1);
bcs = security_ftr_enabled(SEC_FTR_BCCTRL_SERIALISED);
ccd = security_ftr_enabled(SEC_FTR_COUNT_CACHE_DISABLED);
- ori = security_ftr_enabled(SEC_FTR_SPEC_BAR_ORI31);
if (bcs || ccd) {
seq_buf_printf(&s, "Mitigation: ");
@@ -151,9 +161,6 @@ ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, c
} else
seq_buf_printf(&s, "Vulnerable");
- if (ori)
- seq_buf_printf(&s, ", ori31 speculation barrier enabled");
-
seq_buf_printf(&s, "\n");
return s.len;
--
2.14.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-09 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-09 6:25 Michael Ellerman [this message]
2018-07-24 13:59 ` powerpc64s: Show ori31 availability in spectre_v1 sysfs file not v2 Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180709062521.693-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox