From: John Allen <jallen@linux.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/pseries: Wait for completion of hotplug events during PRRN handling
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:22:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180723152223.mydr5dovcv26domv@p50> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k1pmhxx7.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:41:24PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>John Allen <jallen@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> While handling PRRN events, the time to handle the actual hotplug events
>> dwarfs the time it takes to perform the device tree updates and queue the
>> hotplug events. In the case that PRRN events are being queued continuously,
>> hotplug events have been observed to be queued faster than the kernel can
>> actually handle them. This patch avoids the problem by waiting for a
>> hotplug request to complete before queueing more hotplug events.
>
>So do we need the hotplug work queue at all? Can we just call
>handle_dlpar_errorlog() directly?
>
>Or are we using the work queue to serialise things? And if so would a
>mutex be better?
Right, the workqueue is meant to serialize all hotplug events and it
gets used for more than just PRRN events. I believe the motivation for
using the workqueue over a mutex is that KVM guests initiate hotplug
events through the hotplug interrupt and can queue fairly large requests
meaning that in this scenario, waiting for a lock would block interrupts
for a while. Using the workqueue allows us to serialize hotplug events
from different sources in the same way without worrying about the
context in which the event is generated.
>
>It looks like prrn_update_node() is called via at least, prrn_work_fn()
>and post_mobility_fixup().
>
>The latter is called from migration_store(), which seems like it would
>be harmless. But also from pseries_suspend_enable_irqs() which I'm less
>clear on.
Yeah, that doesn't seem to make sense based on the function name. Odd
that prrn_update_node is being called from anywhere outside of handling
PRRN events. Perhaps if other code paths are using the function, it
needs a more generic name.
-John
>
>cheers
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
>> index 8a8033a249c7..49930848fa78 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
>> @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ static int add_dt_node(__be32 parent_phandle, __be32 drc_index)
>> static void prrn_update_node(__be32 phandle)
>> {
>> struct pseries_hp_errorlog *hp_elog;
>> + struct completion hotplug_done;
>> struct device_node *dn;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -263,7 +264,9 @@ static void prrn_update_node(__be32 phandle)
>> hp_elog->id_type = PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_INDEX;
>> hp_elog->_drc_u.drc_index = phandle;
>>
>> - queue_hotplug_event(hp_elog, NULL, NULL);
>> + init_completion(&hotplug_done);
>> + queue_hotplug_event(hp_elog, &hotplug_done, NULL);
>> + wait_for_completion(&hotplug_done);
>>
>> kfree(hp_elog);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-23 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-17 19:40 [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc/pseries: Improve serialization of PRRN events John Allen
2018-07-17 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/pseries: Avoid blocking rtas polling handling multiple " John Allen
2018-07-20 16:12 ` Nathan Fontenot
2018-07-23 13:27 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-07-23 15:05 ` John Allen
2018-08-01 13:02 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-08-06 19:09 ` John Allen
2018-07-17 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/pseries: Wait for completion of hotplug events during PRRN handling John Allen
2018-07-20 16:12 ` Nathan Fontenot
2018-07-23 13:41 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-07-23 15:22 ` John Allen [this message]
2018-08-01 13:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-08-07 19:26 ` John Allen
2018-08-08 13:38 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180723152223.mydr5dovcv26domv@p50 \
--to=jallen@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).