From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: John Allen <jallen@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com,
mgorman@suse.de, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Infinite looping observed in __offline_pages
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:16:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180730091605.GF24267@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180727173259.htdxpn4i2fxprpaj@p50.austin.ibm.com>
On Fri 27-07-18 12:32:59, John Allen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 25-07-18 13:11:15, John Allen wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Does a failure in do_migrate_range indicate that the range is unmigratable
> > > and the loop in __offline_pages should terminate and goto failed_removal? Or
> > > should we allow a certain number of retrys before we
> > > give up on migrating the range?
> >
> > Unfortunatelly not. Migration code doesn't tell a difference between
> > ephemeral and permanent failures. We are relying on
> > start_isolate_page_range to tell us this. So the question is, what kind
> > of page is not migratable and for what reason.
> >
> > Are you able to add some debugging to give us more information. The
> > current debugging code in the hotplug/migration sucks...
>
> After reproducing the problem a couple times, it seems that it can occur for
> different types of pages. Running page-types on the offending page over two
> separate instances produced the following:
>
> # tools/vm/page-types -a 307968-308224
> flags page-count MB symbolic-flags long-symbolic-flags
> 0x0000000000000400 1 0 __________B________________________________ buddy
> total 1 0
Huh! How come a buddy page has non zero reference count.
>
> And the following on a separate run:
>
> # tools/vm/page-types -a 313088-313344
> flags page-count MB symbolic-flags long-symbolic-flags
> 0x000000000000006c 1 0 __RU_lA____________________________________ referenced,uptodate,lru,active
> total 1 0
Hmm, what is the expected page count in this case? Seeing 1 doesn't look
particularly wrong.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-30 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-25 18:11 Infinite looping observed in __offline_pages John Allen
2018-07-25 20:03 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-27 17:32 ` John Allen
2018-07-30 9:16 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-08-01 11:09 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-08-01 11:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-22 9:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-08-22 10:53 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-22 18:58 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-08-23 3:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-08-23 7:25 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-01 1:37 ` Rashmica
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180730091605.GF24267@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=jallen@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).