From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41kdwf3GK7zF3Hh for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 23:36:50 +1000 (AEST) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 16:36:43 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , robh@kernel.org, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, Jason Wang , linuxram@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org, paulus@samba.org, joe@perches.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, elfring@users.sourceforge.net, haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Virtio uses DMA API for all devices Message-ID: <20180806163440-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20180720035941.6844-1-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180802235332-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20180803220812-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <01c74680c4b3aa25d9b4375a9ab5e10046b7c71b.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <20180805032355-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <74a1e1b8-81e0-84db-6d0d-d8bd9caebb4a@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <74a1e1b8-81e0-84db-6d0d-d8bd9caebb4a@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 02:32:28PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 08/05/2018 05:54 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 08:21:26PM -0500, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >> On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 22:08 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>>>> Please go through these patches and review whether this approach broadly > >>>>>> makes sense. I will appreciate suggestions, inputs, comments regarding > >>>>>> the patches or the approach in general. Thank you. > >>>>> > >>>>> Jason did some work on profiling this. Unfortunately he reports > >>>>> about 4% extra overhead from this switch on x86 with no vIOMMU. > >>>> > >>>> The test is rather simple, just run pktgen (pktgen_sample01_simple.sh) in > >>>> guest and measure PPS on tap on host. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Could you supply host configuration involved please? > >> > >> I wonder how much of that could be caused by Spectre mitigations > >> blowing up indirect function calls... > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Ben. > > > > I won't be surprised. If yes I suggested a way to mitigate the overhead. > > Did we get better results (lower regression due to indirect calls) with > the suggested mitigation ? Just curious. I'm referring to this: I wonder whether we can support map_sg and friends being NULL, then use that when mapping is an identity. A conditional branch there is likely very cheap. I don't think anyone tried implementing this yes. -- MST