From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41l4SB6KV4zDqBx for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 16:32:10 +1000 (AEST) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 23:32:01 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Christoph Hellwig , Will Deacon , Anshuman Khandual , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, robh@kernel.org, joe@perches.com, elfring@users.sourceforge.net, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, jasowang@redhat.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxram@us.ibm.com, haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Virtio uses DMA API for all devices Message-ID: <20180807063201.GB23159@infradead.org> References: <051fd78e15595b414839fa8f9d445b9f4d7576c6.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <20180805031046-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20180806164106-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20180806233024-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <0967fc30001323e6e38ed12c8dba8ee3d1aa13f5.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <20180807002857-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <93518075238a07e9f011774d89bdc652c083f1ba.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <20180807024503-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20180807024503-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 02:45:25AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I think that's where Christoph might have specific ideas about it. > > > > OK well, assuming Christoph can solve the direct case in a way that > > also work for the virtio !iommu case, we still want some bit of logic > > somewhere that will "switch" to swiotlb based ops if the DMA mask is > > limited. > > > > You mentioned an RFC for that ? Do you happen to have a link ? > > No but Christoph did I think. Do you mean the direct map retpoline mitigation? It is here: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg495413.html https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg495785.html