From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64s: move machine check SLB flushing to mm/slb.c
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:45:10 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180809084510.351c4870@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180808222252.5be0feac@kitsune.suse.cz>
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 22:22:52 +0200
Michal Such=C3=A1nek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 14:13:49 +1000
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> > The machine check code that flushes and restores bolted segments in
> > real mode belongs in mm/slb.c. This will be used by pseries machine
> > check and idle code.
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h | 3 ++
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/mce_power.c | 21 ++--------
> > arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c | 38
> > +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >=20
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h
> > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h index
> > 2f74bdc805e0..d4e398185b3a 100644 ---
> > a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h +++
> > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu-hash.h @@ -497,6 +497,9 @@
> > extern void hpte_init_native(void);=20
> > extern void slb_initialize(void);
> > extern void slb_flush_and_rebolt(void);
> > +extern void slb_flush_all_realmode(void);
> > +extern void __slb_restore_bolted_realmode(void);
> > +extern void slb_restore_bolted_realmode(void);
> > =20
> > extern void slb_vmalloc_update(void);
> > extern void slb_set_size(u16 size);
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce_power.c
> > b/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce_power.c index d6756af6ec78..50f7b9817246
> > 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce_power.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce_power.c
> > @@ -62,11 +62,8 @@ static unsigned long addr_to_pfn(struct pt_regs
> > *regs, unsigned long addr) #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
> > static void flush_and_reload_slb(void)
> > {
> > - struct slb_shadow *slb;
> > - unsigned long i, n;
> > -
> > /* Invalidate all SLBs */
> > - asm volatile("slbmte %0,%0; slbia" : : "r" (0));
> > + slb_flush_all_realmode();
> > =20
> > #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HANDLER
> > /*
> > @@ -76,22 +73,10 @@ static void flush_and_reload_slb(void)
> > if (get_paca()->kvm_hstate.in_guest)
> > return;
> > #endif
> > -
> > - /* For host kernel, reload the SLBs from shadow SLB buffer.
> > */
> > - slb =3D get_slb_shadow();
> > - if (!slb)
> > + if (early_radix_enabled())
> > return; =20
>=20
> And we lose the check that the shadow slb exists. Is !slb equivalent to
> early_radix_enabled()=20
Yeah pretty close to.
>=20
> > =20
> > - n =3D min_t(u32, be32_to_cpu(slb->persistent), SLB_MIN_SIZE);
> > -
> > - /* Load up the SLB entries from shadow SLB */
> > - for (i =3D 0; i < n; i++) {
> > - unsigned long rb =3D
> > be64_to_cpu(slb->save_area[i].esid);
> > - unsigned long rs =3D
> > be64_to_cpu(slb->save_area[i].vsid); -
> > - rb =3D (rb & ~0xFFFul) | i;
> > - asm volatile("slbmte %0,%1" : : "r" (rs), "r" (rb));
> > - }
> > + slb_restore_bolted_realmode();
> > }
> > #endif
> > =20
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c
> > index cb796724a6fc..136db8652577 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c
> > @@ -90,6 +90,44 @@ static inline void create_shadowed_slbe(unsigned
> > long ea, int ssize, : "memory" );
> > }
> > =20
> > +/*
> > + * Insert bolted entries into SLB (which may not be empty).
> > + */
> > +void __slb_restore_bolted_realmode(void)
> > +{
> > + struct slb_shadow *p =3D get_slb_shadow();
> > + enum slb_index index; =20
>=20
> or can we get here at some point when shadow slb is not populated?
We shouldn't because we won't turn the MMU on so we shouldn't get SLB
MCEs... But I don't think that's guaranteed anywhere, so yeah wouldn't
hurt to add that check back in.
I'll send out another revision.
Thanks,
Nick
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-08 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-03 4:13 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64s: move machine check SLB flushing to mm/slb.c Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-03 4:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/64s: reimplement book3s idle code in C Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-09 14:45 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2018-08-09 23:30 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-08 20:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64s: move machine check SLB flushing to mm/slb.c Michal Suchánek
2018-08-08 22:45 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180809084510.351c4870@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).