From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41x6c84gNxzF2Dd for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:43:52 +1000 (AEST) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:41:18 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Andrew Donnellan Cc: Michael Ellerman , Russell Currey , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christophe LEROY Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/mm: fix a warning when a cache is common to PGD and hugepages Message-ID: <20180823144118.GU24439@gate.crashing.org> References: <2f96bf1a8df1091c642de099ed07c34b5ab9b90a.1534258290.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> <4aaca2d27429e6bdadc340fd3b96e7c350c4b2f4.1534258290.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> <6dea8d0c-c4ab-49aa-da26-a729c18fa818@linux.ibm.com> <006e5f33-b816-7508-faac-da26a860659c@c-s.fr> <3e6412ac-c645-908f-a3bb-c9a2a72f4b68@linux.ibm.com> <20180823103625.GR24439@gate.crashing.org> <8ada20e9-3bc1-fdaf-d78f-2f5a317e8216@c-s.fr> <87a7pdl2jy.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:32:16PM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 23/08/18 21:56, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >Christophe LEROY writes: > > > >>Le 23/08/2018 à 12:36, Segher Boessenkool a écrit : > >>>On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:40:22AM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote: > >>>>The only small problème I have is that some version of GCC seems to > >>>>complain about big memset() (132k and 256k ones). Is there a way to tell > >>>>GCC we really want to do it ? > >>> > >>>I'm not sure what you mean. Complain, is that a warning, is that an > >>>error? > >>>What does it say? Do you have some example code to reproduce it? Etc. > >> > >>I saw the warnings in the checks at > >>https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/957566/ > >>Unfortunatly the link is now broken. > > > >ruscur/ajd any idea what happened to the snowpatch links here? > > I think they've disappeared because our log rotation is too fast - I've > now upped it to 30 days. I guess over time we'll figure out what we need > in this regard, ideally we'd keep logs indefinitely but they're several > megs per build. > > I've kicked off another build for this series and the links in Patchwork > should update to point to the new job when it's done (probably in the > next couple of hours). It's back, thanks Andrew! The warnings are not from GCC at all: the warnings are from sparse. Segher