From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FDAC64EAD for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D7DF20C0A for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:59:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3D7DF20C0A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42Twl364ZNzF3Dp for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 22:59:43 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.101.70; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=will.deacon@arm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42TwhL0NkQzF39g for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 22:57:18 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597FE15BE; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 04:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from edgewater-inn.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2A9D23F5D3; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 04:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by edgewater-inn.cambridge.arm.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 782B61AE03D0; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:57:13 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:57:13 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/36] dt-bindings: arm: Convert PMU binding to json-schema Message-ID: <20181009115713.GE6248@arm.com> References: <20181005165848.3474-1-robh@kernel.org> <20181005165848.3474-14-robh@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181005165848.3474-14-robh@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Kumar Gala , Grant Likely , Arnd Bergmann , Tom Rini , Frank Rowand , Linus Walleij , Pantelis Antoniou , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson , Mark Brown , Geert Uytterhoeven , Jonathan Cameron , Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hi Rob, On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 11:58:25AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > Convert ARM PMU binding to DT schema format using json-schema. > > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: Mark Rutland > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt | 70 -------------- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml | 96 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml [...] > -- interrupts : 1 combined interrupt or 1 per core. If the interrupt is a per-cpu > - interrupt (PPI) then 1 interrupt should be specified. [...] > + interrupts: > + oneOf: > + - maxItems: 1 > + - minItems: 2 > + maxItems: 8 > + description: 1 interrupt per core. > + > + interrupts-extended: > + $ref: '#/properties/interrupts' This seems like a semantic different between the two representations, or am I missing something here? Specifically, both the introduction of interrupts-extended and also dropping any mention of using a single per-cpu interrupt (the single combined case is no longer support by Linux; not sure if you want to keep it in the binding). Will