linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: frowand.list@gmail.com
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>,
	linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_put() after add new node to changeset
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:05:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181018170502.GB15557@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1539657458-24401-3-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 07:37:22PM -0700, frowand.list@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
> 
> The refcount of a newly added overlay node decrements to one
> (instead of zero) when the overlay changeset is destroyed.  This
> change will cause the final decrement be to zero.
> 
> After applying this patch, new validation warnings will be
> reported from the devicetree unittest during boot due to
> a pre-existing devicetree bug.  The warnings will be similar to:
> 
>   OF: ERROR: memory leak of_node_release() overlay node /testcase-data/overlay-node/test-bus/test-unittest4 before free overlay changeset

Same comment on formatting.

> 
> This pre-existing devicetree bug will also trigger a WARN_ONCE() from
> refcount_sub_and_test_checked() when an overlay changeset is
> destroyed without having first been applied.  This scenario occurs
> when an error in the overlay is detected during the overlay changeset
> creation:
> 
>   WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/refcount.c:187 refcount_sub_and_test_checked+0xa8/0xbc
>   refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
> 
>   (unwind_backtrace) from (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>   (show_stack) from (dump_stack+0x6c/0x8c)
>   (dump_stack) from (__warn+0xdc/0x104)
>   (__warn) from (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x44/0x6c)
>   (warn_slowpath_fmt) from (refcount_sub_and_test_checked+0xa8/0xbc)
>   (refcount_sub_and_test_checked) from (kobject_put+0x24/0x208)
>   (kobject_put) from (of_changeset_destroy+0x2c/0xb4)
>   (of_changeset_destroy) from (free_overlay_changeset+0x1c/0x9c)
>   (free_overlay_changeset) from (of_overlay_remove+0x284/0x2cc)
>   (of_overlay_remove) from (of_unittest_apply_revert_overlay_check.constprop.4+0xf8/0x1e8)
>   (of_unittest_apply_revert_overlay_check.constprop.4) from (of_unittest_overlay+0x960/0xed8)
>   (of_unittest_overlay) from (of_unittest+0x1cc4/0x2138)
>   (of_unittest) from (do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x28c)
>   (do_one_initcall) from (kernel_init_freeable+0x29c/0x378)
>   (kernel_init_freeable) from (kernel_init+0x8/0x110)
>   (kernel_init) from (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/overlay.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> index 1176cb4b6e4e..32cfee68f2e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,9 @@ static int add_changeset_node(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs,
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> -		return build_changeset_next_level(ovcs, tchild, node);
> +		ret = build_changeset_next_level(ovcs, tchild, node);
> +		of_node_put(tchild);
> +		return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (node->phandle && tchild->phandle)
> -- 
> Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-18 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-16  2:37 [PATCH v4 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] of: overlay: add tests to validate kfrees from overlay removal frowand.list
2018-10-17 21:30   ` Alan Tull
2018-10-18 20:24     ` Alan Tull
2018-10-18 17:03   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-18 19:01     ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_put() after add new node to changeset frowand.list
2018-10-18 17:05   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2018-10-18 19:02     ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_get() in __of_attach_node_sysfs frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] powerpc/pseries: add of_node_put() in dlpar_detach_node() frowand.list
2018-10-18 17:09   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-18 19:09     ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-19 16:10       ` Rob Herring
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] of: overlay: do not duplicate properties from overlay for " frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] of: dynamic: change type of of_{at, de}tach_node() to void frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] of: overlay: reorder fields in struct fragment frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] of: overlay: validate overlay properties #address-cells and #size-cells frowand.list
2018-10-18 18:13   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-18 19:13     ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] of: overlay: make all pr_debug() and pr_err() messages unique frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] of: overlay: test case of two fragments adding same node frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments add or delete " frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments touching same property frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] of: unittest: remove unused of_unittest_apply_overlay() argument frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] of: overlay: set node fields from properties when add new overlay node frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] of: unittest: allow base devicetree to have symbol metadata frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] of: unittest: find overlays[] entry by name instead of index frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] of: unittest: initialize args before calling of_*parse_*() frowand.list
2018-10-16  9:47 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes Michael Ellerman
2018-10-17  3:08   ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-17 21:16     ` Alan Tull

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181018170502.GB15557@bogus \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=atull@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).