From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5BCC004D3 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 281372075D for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="ARdskZmJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 281372075D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42g4H15Jm7zDrLK for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 20:10:37 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="ARdskZmJ"; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=armlinux.org.uk (client-ip=2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6; helo=pandora.armlinux.org.uk; envelope-from=linux+linuxppc-dev=lists.ozlabs.org@armlinux.org.uk; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="ARdskZmJ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42g4DX6GfjzDrJw for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 20:08:28 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2014; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=93k5CqI65G3jET7vIj4u/I4TSAT+AQg6rgRWlfC0/Ro=; b=ARdskZmJnjyWWAdXWv8a7JPhk dCdKcREeaHEZ6xT06CWyebSyY7biKhPd1upSW9xtJpUGZonDMB7jyEiAsYLUD8HjqpXAWBvDWEvO6 JjWubNmIzVcePmLtwUUqQfmftODENxiFn8RLLU/w4NagmFt/4trkno0O3V1Gs+mQNIFcg=; Received: from n2100.armlinux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda:1:214:fdff:fe10:4f86]:58099) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gFF8c-0001CX-Sv; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:07:39 +0100 Received: from linux by n2100.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gFF8Y-0007Ni-3v; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:07:34 +0100 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:07:32 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Maksym Kokhan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] add generic builtin command line Message-ID: <20181024090732.GS30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <1538067309-5711-1-git-send-email-maksym.kokhan@globallogic.com> <20180929181725.GB27441@fifo99.com> <20181023144815.GP30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Ruslan Bilovol , Will Deacon , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , Daniel Walker , Frank Rowand , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Catalin Marinas , James Hogan , Daniel Walker , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Andrii Bordunov , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , Paul Burton , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +0300, Maksym Kokhan wrote: > Do you mean, that you haven't seen patch for ARM, which I sent on > September 27 along with cover and patch 1? It is strange, because > you was the one from recipients. If so, you can see this patch here: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/992779/ It seems that I have received patch 5, _but_ it's not threaded with the cover message and patch 1. With 50k messages in my inbox, and 3k messages since you sent the series, it's virtually impossible to find it (I only found it by looking at my mail server logs from September to find the subject, and then searching my mailbox for that subject.) This is unnecessarily difficult. > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:48 PM Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 05:43:18PM +0300, Maksym Kokhan wrote: > > > We still have no response to patches for x86, arm, arm64 and powerpc. > > > Is current generic command line implementation appropriate for these > > > architectures? > > > Is it possible to merge these patches in the current form (for x86, > > > arm, arm64 and powerpc)? > > > > You may wish to consider your recipients - I seem to only have received > > the cover and patch 1 (which doesn't include any ARM specific bits). > > It may be that you're not getting responses because people haven't seen > > your patches. > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up > > According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up