linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Fix compilation issue due to asm label
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 22:48:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181031171813.8970-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

We are using 'dscr_insn' as a label in inline asm to identify if a
SIGILL was generated by the mtspr instruction at that point. However,
with inline assembly, the compiler is still free to duplicate the asm
statement for optimization purposes, which results in the label being
defined twice with the error:
	/tmp/ccerQCql.s:874: Error: symbol `dscr_insn' is already defined

With different compiler versions, we may also see:
	/tmp/ccJzLDlN.o:(.toc+0x0): undefined reference to `dscr_insn'

Remove the use of the label in the inline assembly. Instead, just look
for the offending instruction in the signal handler.

Reported-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/utils.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/utils.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/utils.c
index 43c342845be0..ed62f4153d3e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/utils.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/utils.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
 #include "utils.h"
 
 static char auxv[4096];
-extern unsigned int dscr_insn[];
 
 int read_auxv(char *buf, ssize_t buf_size)
 {
@@ -247,7 +246,8 @@ static void sigill_handler(int signr, siginfo_t *info, void *unused)
 	ucontext_t *ctx = (ucontext_t *)unused;
 	unsigned long *pc = &UCONTEXT_NIA(ctx);
 
-	if (*pc == (unsigned long)&dscr_insn) {
+	/* mtspr 3,RS to check for move to DSCR below */
+	if ((*((unsigned int *)*pc) & 0xfc1fffff) == 0x7c0303a6) {
 		if (!warned++)
 			printf("WARNING: Skipping over dscr setup. Consider running 'ppc64_cpu --dscr=1' manually.\n");
 		*pc += 4;
@@ -271,5 +271,5 @@ void set_dscr(unsigned long val)
 		init = 1;
 	}
 
-	asm volatile("dscr_insn: mtspr %1,%0" : : "r" (val), "i" (SPRN_DSCR));
+	asm volatile("mtspr %1,%0" : : "r" (val), "i" (SPRN_DSCR));
 }
-- 
2.19.1


             reply	other threads:[~2018-10-31 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-31 17:18 Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2018-10-31 17:24 ` [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Fix compilation issue due to asm label Naveen N. Rao
2018-10-31 19:05   ` Breno Leitao
2018-11-01 12:46 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181031171813.8970-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).