From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D941C43441 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 992092145D for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:47:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 992092145D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42zGW14D1yzF3P5 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 04:47:09 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com (client-ip=134.134.136.65; helo=mga03.intel.com; envelope-from=keith.busch@intel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42zGSK4qbvzF1fH for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 04:44:48 +1100 (AEDT) X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2018 09:44:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,253,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="250960116" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.232.112.69]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2018 09:44:43 -0800 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 10:41:27 -0700 From: Keith Busch To: Sinan Kaya Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Consistently use _OSC to determine who owns AER Message-ID: <20181119174127.GE26595@localhost.localdomain> References: <20181115231605.24352-1-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> <20181119165318.GB26595@localhost.localdomain> <74f2c527-0890-5e14-5e2d-48934a42dae6@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com, helgaas@google.com, sbobroff@linux.ibm.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Shyam_Iyer@dell.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de, oohall@gmail.com, mr.nuke.me@gmail.com, Tyler Baicar , bhelgaas@google.com, austin_bolen@dell.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, lenb@kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:42:25PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 11/19/2018 12:32 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > > > > > But we're not using HEST as a fine grain control. We disable native AER > > > handling if *any* device has FF set in HEST, and that just forces people > > > to use pcie_ports=native to get around that. > > > > > > > I don't see *any* in the code.  aer_hest_parse() does the HEST table parsing. > > It switches to firmware first mode if global flag in HEST is set. Otherwise > > for each BDF in device, hest_match_pci() is used to do a cross-matching against > > HEST table contents. > > > > Am I missing something? > > I see. I think you are talking about aer_firmware_first, right? > > aer_set_firmware_first() and pcie_aer_get_firmware_first() seem to do the right > thing. Right, but what difference does it make if device specific AER checks do the right thing if pcie_aer_init() doesn't even register it's port driver? > aer_firmware_first is probably getting set because events are all routed to a > single root port and aer_acpi_firmware_first() is used to decide whether AER > should be initialized or not. > > I think I understand what is going on now. > > Still, breaking existing systems that rely on HEST table is not cool. > I'd rather have users specify "pcie_ports=native" to skip FF rather than > having broken systems by default to be honest. The pcie_ports=native work-around ignores FF to potentially unknown results, though.