From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sh: prefer memblock APIs returning virtual address
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:10:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203161052.GA4244@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1543852035-26634-4-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Mike.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 05:47:12PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Rather than use the memblock_alloc_base that returns a physical address and
> then convert this address to the virtual one, use appropriate memblock
> function that returns a virtual address.
>
> There is a small functional change in the allocation of then NODE_DATA().
> Instead of panicing if the local allocation failed, the non-local
> allocation attempt will be made.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/sh/mm/init.c | 18 +++++-------------
> arch/sh/mm/numa.c | 5 ++---
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> index c8c13c77..3576b5f 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> @@ -192,24 +192,16 @@ void __init page_table_range_init(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> void __init allocate_pgdat(unsigned int nid)
> {
> unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> - unsigned long phys;
> -#endif
>
> get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> - phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> - SMP_CACHE_BYTES, end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> - /* Retry with all of system memory */
> - if (!phys)
> - phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> - SMP_CACHE_BYTES, memblock_end_of_DRAM());
> - if (!phys)
> + NODE_DATA(nid) = memblock_alloc_try_nid_nopanic(
> + sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> + SMP_CACHE_BYTES, MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT,
> + MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
> + if (!NODE_DATA(nid))
> panic("Can't allocate pgdat for node %d\n", nid);
> -
> - NODE_DATA(nid) = __va(phys);
> - memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(struct pglist_data));
The new code will always assign NODE_DATA(nid), where the old
code only assigned NODE_DATA(nid) in the good case.
I dunno if this is an issue, just noticed the difference and
wanted to point it out.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-03 15:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] memblock: simplify several early memory allocation Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc: prefer memblock APIs returning virtual address Mike Rapoport
2018-12-04 9:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-04 17:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-05 12:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-05 21:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] microblaze: prefer memblock API " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-05 15:29 ` Michal Simek
2018-12-06 7:31 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] sh: prefer memblock APIs " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:10 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2018-12-03 16:28 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] openrisc: simplify pte_alloc_one_kernel() Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arch: simplify several early memory allocations Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-03 16:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-06 18:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-06 21:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] arm, unicore32: remove early_alloc*() wrappers Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:27 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-03 16:55 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181203161052.GA4244@ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deanbo422@gmail.com \
--cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
--cc=gxt@pku.edu.cn \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).