linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix -mcpu= options for SPE-only compiler
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:40:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181229114012.GB28554@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99f1a5d8ffcb3539b653a5f123ef32735f389af4.camel@decadent.org.uk>

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 02:32:07AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-12-26 at 17:45 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 02:15:11PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > GCC for Debian's "powerpcspe" architecture only supports 32-bit
> > > SPE targets, and using -mcpu=powerpc or -mcpu=powerpc64 is a fatal
> > > error.
> > 
> > I don't see where your patch touches -mcpu=powerpc, and I don't see how
> > it would make a difference either?

[ I now see that error fwiw.  Yuck. ]

> Look at the assignments that are conditional on HAS_BIARCH.

Sure, you change how HAS_BIARCH is set.  That has more effects than just
not using -mcpu=powerpc (which is fine, but the message is confusing).

> > > +ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> > >  ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
> > >  ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> > >  CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -mcpu=power8
> > > @@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ endif
> > >  else
> > >  CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -mcpu=powerpc64
> > >  endif
> > > +endif
> > 
> > How can CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 be true while CONFIG_PPC64 is fals?  That
> > does not make a lot of sense.
> 
> But there is an "else" part here.

Yeah I see.  It would be better to have fewer nested conditionals here
instead of more...


Segher

      reply	other threads:[~2018-12-29 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-26 14:15 [PATCH] powerpc: Fix -mcpu= options for SPE-only compiler Ben Hutchings
2018-12-26 23:45 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-12-27  2:32   ` Ben Hutchings
2018-12-29 11:40     ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181229114012.GB28554@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=debian-kernel@lists.debian.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).