From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ED7C43387 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AF3C20879 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:38:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9AF3C20879 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=de.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43bHs04hzTzDr2F for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:38:44 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=de.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=de.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43bHpz0nBJzDqrT for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:36:58 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x0AKYJd9002068 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:36:55 -0500 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2pxb0mwtnb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:36:55 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:36:52 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:36:42 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0AKaflZ15859874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:36:41 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB5742042; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:36:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065314203F; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:36:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.145.24.85]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:36:39 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 21:36:38 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] arch: add pkey and rseq syscall numbers everywhere References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190110162435.309262-16-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190110162435.309262-16-arnd@arndb.de> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19011020-0020-0000-0000-000003049593 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19011020-0021-0000-0000-000021559B2E Message-Id: <20190110203638.GB3676@osiris> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-01-10_08:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=5 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=971 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901100159 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dalias@libc.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux@dominikbrodowski.net, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, deepa.kernel@gmail.com, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, y2038@lists.linaro.org, deller@gmx.de, x86@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mingo@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, firoz.khan@linaro.org, mattst88@gmail.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, monstr@monstr.eu, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul.burton@mips.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:24:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Most architectures define system call numbers for the rseq and pkey system > calls, even when they don't support the features, and perhaps never will. > > Only a few architectures are missing these, so just define them anyway > for consistency. If we decide to add them later to one of these, the > system call numbers won't get out of sync then. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h > index a1fbf15d53aa..ed08f114ee91 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h > @@ -11,9 +11,6 @@ > #include > > #define __IGNORE_time > -#define __IGNORE_pkey_mprotect > -#define __IGNORE_pkey_alloc > -#define __IGNORE_pkey_free > > #define __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT > #define __ARCH_WANT_OLD_READDIR > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl b/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl > index 428cf512a757..f84ea364a302 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl > @@ -391,6 +391,9 @@ > 381 common kexec_file_load sys_kexec_file_load compat_sys_kexec_file_load > 382 common io_pgetevents sys_io_pgetevents compat_sys_io_pgetevents > 383 common rseq sys_rseq compat_sys_rseq > +384 common pkey_alloc sys_pkey_alloc sys_pkey_alloc > +385 common pkey_free sys_pkey_free sys_pkey_free > +386 common pkey_mprotect sys_pkey_mprotect sys_pkey_mprotect Since you only need/want the system call numbers, could you please change these lines to: > +384 common pkey_alloc - - > +385 common pkey_free - - > +386 common pkey_mprotect - - Otherwise it _looks_ like we would need compat wrappers here as well, even though all of them would just jump to sys_ni_syscall() in this case. Making this explicit seems to better.