From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F056C7112F for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1579620879 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:22:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1579620879 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=de.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43jrKm14jtzDqZS for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:22:52 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=de.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=de.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43jrG61MD5zDqX6 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:19:41 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x0LCJ9hQ018892 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 07:19:39 -0500 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2q5csxuj1r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 07:19:39 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:19:36 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:19:27 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0LCJQuZ60817412 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:19:26 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528CF5204F; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:19:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.152.212.95]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C7C552051; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:19:25 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:19:24 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/29] y2038: add 64-bit time_t syscalls to all 32-bit architectures References: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19012112-0016-0000-0000-000002484921 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19012112-0017-0000-0000-000032A279F9 Message-Id: <20190121121923.GF4020@osiris> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-01-21_07:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=522 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901210097 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dalias@libc.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, deepa.kernel@gmail.com, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, y2038@lists.linaro.org, deller@gmx.de, x86@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mingo@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, firoz.khan@linaro.org, mattst88@gmail.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, monstr@monstr.eu, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul.burton@mips.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:18:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This adds 21 new system calls on each ABI that has 32-bit time_t > today. All of these have the exact same semantics as their existing > counterparts, and the new ones all have macro names that end in 'time64' > for clarification. > > This gets us to the point of being able to safely use a C library > that has 64-bit time_t in user space. There are still a couple of > loose ends to tie up in various areas of the code, but this is the > big one, and should be entirely uncontroversial at this point. > > In particular, there are four system calls (getitimer, setitimer, > waitid, and getrusage) that don't have a 64-bit counterpart yet, > but these can all be safely implemented in the C library by wrapping > around the existing system calls because the 32-bit time_t they > pass only counts elapsed time, not time since the epoch. They > will be dealt with later. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 20 +++++++++ For the s390 bits: Acked-by: Heiko Carstens