From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DBBC282C0 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5420218A2 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:46:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B5420218A2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43mRKm0RH4zDqQc for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 04:46:52 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.101.70; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=catalin.marinas@arm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43mRHw0D7tzDqPk for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 04:45:14 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5EBEBD; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:45:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from arrakis.emea.arm.com (arrakis.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.113]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76CBD3F5AF; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:45:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:45:02 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/21] memblock: memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(): don't panic Message-ID: <20190125174502.GL25901@arrakis.emea.arm.com> References: <1548057848-15136-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> <1548057848-15136-7-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1548057848-15136-7-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Guo Ren , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Yoshinori Sato , Richard Weinberger , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Mark Salter , Dennis Zhou , Matt Turner , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, Petr Mladek , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Rob Herring , Greentime Hu , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Stafford Horne , Guan Xuetao , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Michal Simek , Tony Luck , linux-mm@kvack.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Burton , Vineet Gupta , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , openrisc@lists.librecores.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:03:53AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c > index ae34e3a..2c61ea4 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c > @@ -237,6 +237,10 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start_pfn, u64 end_pfn) > pr_info("Initmem setup node %d []\n", nid); > > nd_pa = memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid); > + if (!nd_pa) > + panic("Cannot allocate %zu bytes for node %d data\n", > + nd_size, nid); > + > nd = __va(nd_pa); > > /* report and initialize */ Does it mean that memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid() never returns valid physical memory starting at 0? -- Catalin