From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40A4C43381 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA6EE217F9 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:16:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AA6EE217F9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447zq172chzDqT6 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:16:29 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=195.135.220.15; helo=mx1.suse.de; envelope-from=mhocko@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 447zjz373CzDqP4 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:12:06 +1100 (AEDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6C1AF72; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:12:01 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes Message-ID: <20190226131201.GA10588@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20190212095343.23315-1-mhocko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190212095343.23315-1-mhocko@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , x86@kernel.org, LKML , Pingfan Liu , Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue 12-02-19 10:53:41, Michal Hocko wrote: > Hi, > this has been posted as an RFC previously [1]. There didn't seem to be > any objections so I am reposting this for inclusion. I have added a > debugging patch which prints the zonelist setup for each numa node > for an easier debugging of a broken zonelist setup. > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190114082416.30939-1-mhocko@kernel.org Friendly ping. I haven't heard any complains so can we route this via tip/x86/mm or should we go via mmotm. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs