From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846A6C43381 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17F25218CD for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:42:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 17F25218CD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449Lxl5Ll3zDqHP for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 05:42:03 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.101.70; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=sudeep.holla@arm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449Lky59mPzDqHP for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 05:32:42 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34012174E; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:32:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa.arm.com (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 63F233F5C1; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:32:38 -0800 (PST) From: Sudeep Holla To: x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH 4/6] powerpc: use common ptrace_syscall_enter hook to handle _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:32:18 +0000 Message-Id: <20190228183220.15626-5-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190228183220.15626-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <20190228183220.15626-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Haibo Xu , Steve Capper , jdike@addtoit.com, Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , Oleg Nesterov , Bin Lu , Richard Weinberger , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Catalin Marinas , Thomas Gleixner Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Now that we have a new hook ptrace_syscall_enter that can be called from syscall entry code and it handles PTRACE_SYSEMU in generic code, we can do some cleanup using the same in do_syscall_trace_enter. Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c index cb7e1439cafb..978cd2aac29e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -3264,37 +3264,31 @@ long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) { u32 flags; - user_exit(); - - flags = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags) & - (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE); + if (unlikely(ptrace_syscall_enter(regs))) { + /* + * A nonzero return code from tracehook_report_syscall_entry() + * tells us to prevent the syscall execution, but we are not + * going to execute it anyway. + * + * Returning -1 will skip the syscall execution. We want to + * avoid clobbering any registers, so we don't goto the skip + * label below. + */ + return -1; + } - if (flags) { - int rc = tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs); + user_exit(); - if (unlikely(flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) { - /* - * A nonzero return code from - * tracehook_report_syscall_entry() tells us to prevent - * the syscall execution, but we are not going to - * execute it anyway. - * - * Returning -1 will skip the syscall execution. We want - * to avoid clobbering any registers, so we don't goto - * the skip label below. - */ - return -1; - } + flags = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags) & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE; - if (rc) { - /* - * The tracer decided to abort the syscall. Note that - * the tracer may also just change regs->gpr[0] to an - * invalid syscall number, that is handled below on the - * exit path. - */ - goto skip; - } + if (flags && tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) { + /* + * The tracer decided to abort the syscall. Note that + * the tracer may also just change regs->gpr[0] to an + * invalid syscall number, that is handled below on the + * exit path. + */ + goto skip; } /* Run seccomp after ptrace; allow it to set gpr[3]. */ -- 2.17.1