From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B94BC43381 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:09:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9BC820835 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:09:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A9BC820835 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CbNk4tYyzDqGl for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:09:42 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.101.70; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=sudeep.holla@arm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CbLv067mzDqDT for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:08:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71338EBD; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 02:08:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107155-lin (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A4103F703; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 02:07:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:07:56 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: clean up _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling using ptrace_syscall_enter hook Message-ID: <20190304100756.GB32379@e107155-lin> References: <20190228183220.15626-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20190228183220.15626-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Haibo Xu , Steve Capper , Catalin Marinas , Jeff Dike , X86 ML , Will Deacon , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Richard Weinberger , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Bin Lu , linuxppc-dev , linux-arm-kernel Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 05:11:40PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > Now that we have a new hook ptrace_syscall_enter that can be called from > > syscall entry code and it handles PTRACE_SYSEMU in generic code, we > > can do some cleanup using the same in syscall_trace_enter. > > > > Further the extra logic to find single stepping PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP > > in syscall_slow_exit_work seems unnecessary. Let's remove the same. > > I wasn't cc'd on the whole series, so I can't easily review this. Do > you have a test case to make sure that emulation still works? Are > there adequate tests in tools/testing/selftests/x86? Do they still > pass after this patch? > I will ensure you are cc-ed on the whole threads, sorry for missing. I remember seeing some selftests, but I haven't run them yet. -- Regards, Sudeep