From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2572C43381 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AFCA20823 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:45:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6AFCA20823 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CcB12qM5zDqJ1 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:45:29 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.101.70; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=sudeep.holla@arm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44Cc6F6K4RzDqGS for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:42:12 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D26FEBD; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 02:42:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107155-lin (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC9DA3F703; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 02:42:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:42:06 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: "Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] powerpc: use common ptrace_syscall_enter hook to handle _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU Message-ID: <20190304104206.GB1504@e107155-lin> References: <247371ae-3360-95e2-bf1d-21eb9332c31c@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <247371ae-3360-95e2-bf1d-21eb9332c31c@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sudeep Holla , Steve Capper , Catalin Marinas , "jdike@addtoit.com" , "x86@kernel.org" , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Oleg Nesterov , Richard Weinberger , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Thomas Gleixner , "Bin Lu \(Arm Technology China\)" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:36:27AM +0000, Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China) wrote: > On 2019/3/1 2:32, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Now that we have a new hook ptrace_syscall_enter that can be called from > > syscall entry code and it handles PTRACE_SYSEMU in generic code, we > > can do some cleanup using the same in do_syscall_trace_enter. > > > > Cc: Oleg Nesterov > > Cc: Paul Mackerras > > Cc: Michael Ellerman > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > > --- > > arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++-------------------- > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c > > index cb7e1439cafb..978cd2aac29e 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c > > @@ -3264,37 +3264,31 @@ long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) > > { > > u32 flags; > > > > - user_exit(); > > We'd better keep the user_exit() at here in case both context tracking and > SYSCALL_EMU are enabled. > Ah right, spurious change will fix it. -- Regards, Sudeep