From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537FAC43381 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 12:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CBA82070B for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 12:27:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9CBA82070B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CfS433XLzDq5x for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 23:27:48 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=permerror (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org (client-ip=63.228.1.57; helo=gate.crashing.org; envelope-from=segher@kernel.crashing.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44CfN74CPqzDqDS for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 23:24:22 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x24CNZlQ031671; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 06:23:35 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id x24CNWqJ031670; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 06:23:32 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 06:23:32 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ptrace: introduce ptrace_syscall_enter to consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling Message-ID: <20190304122331.GG3969@gate.crashing.org> References: <20190228183220.15626-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20190228183220.15626-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20190304104643.GA28643@e107155-lin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190304104643.GA28643@e107155-lin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Haibo Xu \(Arm Technology China\)" , Steve Capper , Catalin Marinas , "jdike@addtoit.com" , "x86@kernel.org" , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Richard Weinberger , Thomas Gleixner , "Bin Lu \(Arm Technology China\)" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:46:43AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 08:03:47AM +0000, Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China) wrote: > > On 2019/3/1 2:32, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > +long ptrace_syscall_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) > > > +{ > > > +#ifdef TIF_SYSCALL_EMU > > > + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) { > > > + if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)); > > > > Shall we remove the semi-colon at end of the above line? > > Added intentionally to keep GCC happy. GCC warns because the user explicitly asked for it, with __must_check. If you want to do things with an "if" like this, you should write e.g. if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) /* * We can ignore the return code here, because of * X and Y and Z. */ ; Or it probably is nicer to use a block: if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) { /* * We can ignore the return code here, because of * X and Y and Z. */ } The point is, you *always* should have a nice fat comment if you are ignoring the return code of a __must_check function. Segher