From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3131EC43381 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABC5020863 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:35:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ABC5020863 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44NKxc2XvZzDqLc for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 02:35:00 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=oleg@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44NKvx1N8vzDqF3 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 02:33:29 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 988863083391; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.17.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C77CE5D704; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:33:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:33:22 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] x86: clean up _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling using ptrace_syscall_enter hook Message-ID: <20190318153321.GA23521@redhat.com> References: <20190318104925.16600-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20190318104925.16600-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190318104925.16600-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.44]); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:33:27 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Haibo Xu , Steve Capper , Catalin Marinas , jdike@addtoit.com, x86@kernel.org, Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bin Lu , Richard Weinberger , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 03/18, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c > @@ -70,22 +70,16 @@ static long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) > > struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info(); > unsigned long ret = 0; > - bool emulated = false; > u32 work; > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY)) > BUG_ON(regs != task_pt_regs(current)); > > - work = READ_ONCE(ti->flags) & _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY; > - > - if (unlikely(work & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) > - emulated = true; > - > - if ((emulated || (work & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) && > - tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) > + if (unlikely(ptrace_syscall_enter(regs))) > return -1L; > > - if (emulated) > + work = READ_ONCE(ti->flags) & _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY; > + if ((work & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) && tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) > return -1L; Well, I won't really argue, but to be honest I think this change doesn't make the code better... With this patch tracehook_report_syscall_entry() has 2 callers, to me this just adds some confusion. I agree that the usage of emulated/_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU looks a bit overcomplicated, I'd suggest a simple cleanup below. And it seems that _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY needs some cleanups too... We don't need "& _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY" in syscall_trace_enter, and _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY should not include _TIF_NOHZ? Oleg. --- x/arch/x86/entry/common.c +++ x/arch/x86/entry/common.c @@ -70,23 +70,18 @@ static long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info(); unsigned long ret = 0; - bool emulated = false; u32 work; if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY)) BUG_ON(regs != task_pt_regs(current)); - work = READ_ONCE(ti->flags) & _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY; + work = READ_ONCE(ti->flags); - if (unlikely(work & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) - emulated = true; - - if ((emulated || (work & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) && - tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) - return -1L; - - if (emulated) - return -1L; + if (work & (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) { + ret = tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs); + if (ret || (work & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) + return -1L; + } #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP /*