From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D99CC43381 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B79E721741 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:10:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qKJDa9lq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B79E721741 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44Twyj3M6CzDq9T for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 05:10:21 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=sashal@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qKJDa9lq"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44Twq91wKPzDqK9 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 05:03:49 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9AB42087C; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:03:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553709827; bh=MGfIoXnzyNJ/KAFrw5ZJrFi7P/sOO+b797C3j3DpCrs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qKJDa9lqPCT5FrQKRqlbe33Y1Ye8nJS7oPjbXYzBZXdORbP2sT2Gk9qQ/a+zaOe+r 56eY7JaZIzN0iAPiS8P7be/uC6PxgIAFcyBrhSvdPoWSPmaep2ZwWuIFnw4qKCwHN4 ZhUQpFgGkEsWbo2bsOhgFsFweXmOBPHTka2uJitQ= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 061/262] mm/resource: Return real error codes from walk failures Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:58:36 -0400 Message-Id: <20190327180158.10245-61-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20190327180158.10245-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190327180158.10245-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sasha Levin , Tom Lendacky , Michal Hocko , Dave Jiang , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Takashi Iwai , Vishal Verma , Dave Hansen , Huang Ying , Keith Busch , linux-mm@kvack.org, Jerome Glisse , Borislav Petkov , Yaowei Bai , Ross Zwisler , Paul Mackerras , Dan Williams , Fengguang Wu , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Andrew Morton Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Dave Hansen [ Upstream commit 5cd401ace914dc68556c6d2fcae0c349444d5f86 ] walk_system_ram_range() can return an error code either becuase *it* failed, or because the 'func' that it calls returned an error. The memory hotplug does the following: ret = walk_system_ram_range(..., func); if (ret) return ret; and 'ret' makes it out to userspace, eventually. The problem s, walk_system_ram_range() failues that result from *it* failing (as opposed to 'func') return -1. That leads to a very odd -EPERM (-1) return code out to userspace. Make walk_system_ram_range() return -EINVAL for internal failures to keep userspace less confused. This return code is compatible with all the callers that I audited. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas Acked-by: Michael Ellerman (powerpc) Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Dave Jiang Cc: Ross Zwisler Cc: Vishal Verma Cc: Tom Lendacky Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Huang Ying Cc: Fengguang Wu Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Yaowei Bai Cc: Takashi Iwai Cc: Jerome Glisse Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Keith Busch Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/resource.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c index 915c02e8e5dd..ca7ed5158cff 100644 --- a/kernel/resource.c +++ b/kernel/resource.c @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end, int (*func)(struct resource *, void *)) { struct resource res; - int ret = -1; + int ret = -EINVAL; while (start < end && !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, first_lvl, &res)) { @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, unsigned long flags; struct resource res; unsigned long pfn, end_pfn; - int ret = -1; + int ret = -EINVAL; start = (u64) start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; end = ((u64)(start_pfn + nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1; -- 2.19.1