From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39C7C10F13 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D540217F4 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:45:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1D540217F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44g9205HllzDqT3 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 04:45:12 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net (client-ip=45.79.88.28; helo=ms.lwn.net; envelope-from=corbet@lwn.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44g9052X7kzDqS7; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 04:43:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D5D82D8; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 12:43:24 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Convert hwmon documentation to ReST Message-ID: <20190411124324.3ed62fad@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare , linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, Linux Doc Mailing List , Andrew Jeffery , Sudeep Holla , Liviu Dudau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Paul Mackerras , Joel Stanley , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Guenter Roeck Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:22:37 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > This series converts the contents of Documentation/hwmon to ReST > format. > > PS.: I opted to group the conversion files per groups of maintainer > set, as, if I were to generate one patch per file, it would give around > 160 patches. > > I also added those patches to my development tree at: > https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/log/?h=hwmon > > If you want to see the results, they're at: > https://www.infradead.org/~mchehab/hwmon/ This set seems generally good and could probably be applied as-is. But I have to ask...is there a reason to not take the last step and actually bring this stuff into the Sphinx doc tree? We seem to be mostly documenting sysfs files and such. I am *guessing* that perhaps the set should move to Documentation/admin-guide/hwmon? Or have I misunderstood the intended audience here? Thanks, jon