From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"timur@kernel.org" <timur@kernel.org>,
"Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com" <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:06:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190411200602.GA13170@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a04859bff36ba26cb4cb51ff092a3f2e2eca455d.1554975348.git.shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:39:06AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> +/*
> + * Select the pre-processing and post-processing options
By aligning with other function comments:
/**
* Select the pre-processing and post-processing options
> + *
> + * Fsin: input sample rate
> + * Fsout: output sample rate
I would suggest to use inrate and outrate to keep naming consistent.
> + * pre_proc: return value for pre-processing option
> + * post_proc: return value for post-processing option
> + */
> +static int fsl_asrc_sel_proc(int Fsin, int Fsout, int *pre_proc, int *post_proc)
> +{
> + bool det_out_op2_cond;
> + bool det_out_op0_cond;
By looking at the comments below. Probably better to rename them
bool post_proc_cond2, post_proc_cond0;
> + /* Codition for selection of post-processing */
"Codition" -> "Conditions"
> + det_out_op2_cond = (((Fsin * 15 > Fsout * 16) & (Fsout < 56000)) |
> + ((Fsin > 56000) & (Fsout < 56000)));
Combining Daniel's comments + indentation alignment:
det_out_op2_cond = (Fsin * 15 > Fsout * 16 && Fsout < 56000) ||
(Fsin > 56000 && Fsout < 56000);
> + det_out_op0_cond = (Fsin * 23 < Fsout * 8);
> +
> + /*
> + * unsupported case: Tsout>16.125*Tsin, and Tsout>8.125*Tsin.
Funny thing is that there'd be no point in checking the 16.125, if
Tsout is bigger than 8.125 times of Tsin, i.e. only one condition:
Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin
> + * Tsout>16.125*Tsin -> Fsin * 8 > 129 * Fsout
> + * Tsout>8.125*Tsin -> Fsin * 8 > 65 * Fsout
> + * Tsout>4.125*Tsin -> Fsin * 8 > 33 * Fsout
> + * Tsout>1.875*Tsin -> Fsin * 8 > 15 * Fsout
Took me a while to understand what it is saying....
Better to write like this:
/* Does not support cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin */
if (Fsin * 8 > 65 * Fsout) {
pair_err("Does not support %d > 8.125 * %d\n", Fsout, Fsin);
return -EINVAL;
}
/* Otherwise, select pre_proc between [0, 2] */
if (Fsin * 8 > 33 * Fsout)
> + *pre_proc = 2;
> + else if (Fsin * 8 > 15 * Fsout) {
> + if (Fsin > 152000)
> + *pre_proc = 2;
> + else
> + *pre_proc = 1;
> + } else if (Fsin < 76000)
> + *pre_proc = 0;
> + else if (Fsin > 152000)
> + *pre_proc = 2;
> + else
> + *pre_proc = 1;
<== Would look better by moving post_cond calculations here.
> + if (det_out_op2_cond)
> + *post_proc = 2;
> + else if (det_out_op0_cond)
> + *post_proc = 0;
> + else
> + *post_proc = 1;
And we could remove this check below:
> + /* unsupported options */
> + if (*pre_proc == 4 || *pre_proc == 5)
> + return -EINVAL;
So basically we are doing:
1) Error out unsupported cases
2) Select pre_proc
3) Calculate conditions for post_proc
4) Select post_proc
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-11 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-11 9:39 [PATCH V2 0/2] Support more sample rate in asrc S.j. Wang
2019-04-11 9:39 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function S.j. Wang
2019-04-11 11:15 ` Daniel Baluta
2019-04-11 20:06 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2019-04-11 9:39 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Unify the supported input and output rate S.j. Wang
2019-04-11 20:11 ` Nicolin Chen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-17 9:04 [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function S.j. Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190411200602.GA13170@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com \
--to=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=timur@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).