From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E04C10F13 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8783F20821 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:07:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8783F20821 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44kHy94rL1zDqFF for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:07:45 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ldufour@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44k6BM27pszDqDN for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:47:39 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3GDlOjP091910 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:47:37 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rwfsus860-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:47:33 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:46:09 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:45:59 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x3GDjvHK45482116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:45:58 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07D04C058; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:45:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A384C05A; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:45:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nimbus.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com (unknown [9.101.4.33]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:45:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Laurent Dufour To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky , sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, Andrea Arcangeli , Alexei Starovoitov , kemi.wang@intel.com, Daniel Jordan , David Rientjes , Jerome Glisse , Ganesh Mahendran , Minchan Kim , Punit Agrawal , vinayak menon , Yang Shi , zhong jiang , Haiyan Song , Balbir Singh , sj38.park@gmail.com, Michel Lespinasse , Mike Rapoport Subject: [PATCH v12 12/31] mm: protect SPF handler against anon_vma changes Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:45:03 +0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190416134522.17540-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190416134522.17540-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19041613-0016-0000-0000-0000026F7271 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19041613-0017-0000-0000-000032CBBD87 Message-Id: <20190416134522.17540-13-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-16_05:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904160093 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:55:23 +1000 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Tim Chen , haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The speculative page fault handler must be protected against anon_vma changes. This is because page_add_new_anon_rmap() is called during the speculative path. In addition, don't try speculative page fault if the VMA don't have an anon_vma structure allocated because its allocation should be protected by the mmap_sem. In __vma_adjust() when importer->anon_vma is set, there is no need to protect against speculative page faults since speculative page fault is aborted if the vma->anon_vma is not set. When calling page_add_new_anon_rmap() vma->anon_vma is necessarily valid since we checked for it when locking the pte and the anon_vma is removed once the pte is unlocked. So even if the speculative page fault handler is running concurrently with do_unmap(), as the pte is locked in unmap_region() - through unmap_vmas() - and the anon_vma unlinked later, because we check for the vma sequence counter which is updated in unmap_page_range() before locking the pte, and then in free_pgtables() so when locking the pte the change will be detected. Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour --- mm/memory.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 423fa8ea0569..2cf7b6185daa 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -377,7 +377,9 @@ void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma, * Hide vma from rmap and truncate_pagecache before freeing * pgtables */ + vm_write_begin(vma); unlink_anon_vmas(vma); + vm_write_end(vma); unlink_file_vma(vma); if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) { @@ -391,7 +393,9 @@ void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma, && !is_vm_hugetlb_page(next)) { vma = next; next = vma->vm_next; + vm_write_begin(vma); unlink_anon_vmas(vma); + vm_write_end(vma); unlink_file_vma(vma); } free_pgd_range(tlb, addr, vma->vm_end, -- 2.21.0