From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B6BC10F13 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE342075B for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:24:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6BE342075B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44kJKd3NBLzDqDF for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:24:37 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ldufour@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44k6dC57xCzDqFH for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 00:07:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3GDkuNe060182 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:47:17 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rwe36ny9b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:47:09 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:46:20 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:46:11 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x3GDk9qK37617726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:46:09 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978DD4C040; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:46:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF8D4C04A; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:46:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nimbus.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com (unknown [9.101.4.33]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:46:06 +0000 (GMT) From: Laurent Dufour To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky , sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, Andrea Arcangeli , Alexei Starovoitov , kemi.wang@intel.com, Daniel Jordan , David Rientjes , Jerome Glisse , Ganesh Mahendran , Minchan Kim , Punit Agrawal , vinayak menon , Yang Shi , zhong jiang , Haiyan Song , Balbir Singh , sj38.park@gmail.com, Michel Lespinasse , Mike Rapoport Subject: [PATCH v12 15/31] mm: introduce __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:45:06 +0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190416134522.17540-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190416134522.17540-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19041613-0016-0000-0000-0000026F7275 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19041613-0017-0000-0000-000032CBBD8C Message-Id: <20190416134522.17540-16-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-16_05:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904160093 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:55:23 +1000 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Tim Chen , haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The speculative page fault handler which is run without holding the mmap_sem is calling lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable() but the vm_flags is not guaranteed to remain constant. Introducing __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable() which has the vma flags value parameter instead of the vma pointer. Acked-by: David Rientjes Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour --- include/linux/swap.h | 10 ++++++++-- mm/memory.c | 8 ++++---- mm/swap.c | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h index 4bfb5c4ac108..d33b94eb3c69 100644 --- a/include/linux/swap.h +++ b/include/linux/swap.h @@ -343,8 +343,14 @@ extern void deactivate_file_page(struct page *page); extern void mark_page_lazyfree(struct page *page); extern void swap_setup(void); -extern void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, - struct vm_area_struct *vma); +extern void __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, + unsigned long vma_flags); + +static inline void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, + struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + return __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma->vm_flags); +} /* linux/mm/vmscan.c */ extern unsigned long zone_reclaimable_pages(struct zone *zone); diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 56802850e72c..85ec5ce5c0a8 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -2347,7 +2347,7 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf) ptep_clear_flush_notify(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte); page_add_new_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(new_page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vmf->vma_flags); /* * We call the notify macro here because, when using secondary * mmu page tables (such as kvm shadow page tables), we want the @@ -2896,7 +2896,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) if (unlikely(page != swapcache && swapcache)) { page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags); } else { do_page_add_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, exclusive); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, true, false); @@ -3048,7 +3048,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES); page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags); setpte: set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, vmf->address, vmf->pte, entry); @@ -3327,7 +3327,7 @@ vm_fault_t alloc_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES); page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false); mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false); - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma); + __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags); } else { inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, mm_counter_file(page)); page_add_file_rmap(page, false); diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index 3a75722e68a9..a55f0505b563 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -450,12 +450,12 @@ void lru_cache_add(struct page *page) * directly back onto it's zone's unevictable list, it does NOT use a * per cpu pagevec. */ -void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, - struct vm_area_struct *vma) +void __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page, + unsigned long vma_flags) { VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page); - if (likely((vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) != VM_LOCKED)) + if (likely((vma_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) != VM_LOCKED)) SetPageActive(page); else if (!TestSetPageMlocked(page)) { /* -- 2.21.0