From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B41C282DA for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC15218EA for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="SIFc/1m5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BEC15218EA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44lrrl6t5JzDqVP for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:53:27 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.75; helo=conuserg-08.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="SIFc/1m5"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-08.nifty.com (conuserg-08.nifty.com [210.131.2.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44lrlm5hrdzDqTP for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:49:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-08.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3J9mDiP012304; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:48:19 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-08.nifty.com x3J9mDiP012304 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555667301; bh=I2dC2tyzuGPeMYW8zJtLNO2SxFu0p9zAPUz6pi0qgOE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SIFc/1m5Ydc1pZqGsG3eCmgNiSfy3fEcTrRuHrMyDzt0b0jj8XwnxcaFy2Z7DWjGS riHzRpJ1EiNeDdL5Gc9dT3SupXXDMA3GtG2u3K8Pxca74T2MoE5mm4aTh1DIhR0sLH sr01yXX6NTPQ4hvahiHWs5qiPJx+5swXFNgMpDL//v75znyCBqWjafE4ok5qB1xpNw FU4tOnsrJEcK/hbukt8CeCEuN+fheDfVwyNT6ZjigMy9E0ZREQHML885hMwaFDg7W9 EcjaUqUPqSosX8RQMcdvBqJM8nvjfZ6C4I5zLTZlAu6aYHGZ2LzOBOi9XH5rueuPtj Uiob7ameRmtFA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v2 04/11] s390/cpacf: mark scpacf_query() as __always_inline Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:47:47 +0900 Message-Id: <20190419094754.24667-5-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for s390, the following error is reported: In file included from arch/s390/crypto/des_s390.c:19: ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h: In function 'cpacf_query': ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints asm volatile( ^~~ ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h index 3cc52e37b4b2..f316de40e51b 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static inline int __cpacf_check_opcode(unsigned int opcode) } } -static inline int cpacf_query(unsigned int opcode, cpacf_mask_t *mask) +static __always_inline int cpacf_query(unsigned int opcode, cpacf_mask_t *mask) { if (__cpacf_check_opcode(opcode)) { __cpacf_query(opcode, mask); -- 2.17.1