Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function

Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function

[S.j. Wang]

Hi

> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:35AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > When we want to support more sample rate, for example 12kHz/24kHz
> we
> > need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
> > sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which is
> > not flexible.
> >
> > We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which can
> > give the pre-processing and post-processing options according to the
> > sample rate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> 
> A couple of more small comments.
> 
> And please add this when you resend:
> Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
> 
> > + * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin
> 
> Since we have a ratio validation somewhere else, it's okay to drop this line -
> - it may confuse people since the function no longer checks these
> unsupported cases.

I add this for may be in the future we forget the limitation. Just for a reminder.

Best regards
Wang shengjiu
> 
> > +static int fsl_asrc_sel_proc(int inrate, int outrate,
> 
> I think "void" type should be just fine as we made sure there is no
> unsupported cases running in this function.

Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function

[Nicolin Chen]

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 03:15:34AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> Hi
> 
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:35AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > When we want to support more sample rate, for example 12kHz/24kHz
> > we
> > > need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
> > > sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which is
> > > not flexible.
> > >
> > > We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which can
> > > give the pre-processing and post-processing options according to the
> > > sample rate.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> > 
> > A couple of more small comments.
> > 
> > And please add this when you resend:
> > Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
> > 
> > > + * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin
> > 
> > Since we have a ratio validation somewhere else, it's okay to drop this line -
> > - it may confuse people since the function no longer checks these
> > unsupported cases.
> 
> I add this for may be in the future we forget the limitation. Just for a reminder.

Okay. Let's use something more practical like:

+* Make sure to exclude following unsupported cases before calling the function:
+* 1) outrate > 8.125 * inrate
+* 2) outrate > 16.125 * inrate

Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function

[S.j. Wang]

Hi

> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 03:15:34AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:35AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > > When we want to support more sample rate, for example
> 12kHz/24kHz
> > > we
> > > > need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
> > > > sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which
> > > > is not flexible.
> > > >
> > > > We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which
> > > > can give the pre-processing and post-processing options according
> > > > to the sample rate.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> > >
> > > A couple of more small comments.
> > >
> > > And please add this when you resend:
> > > Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > + * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin
> > >
> > > Since we have a ratio validation somewhere else, it's okay to drop
> > > this line -
> > > - it may confuse people since the function no longer checks these
> > > unsupported cases.
> >
> > I add this for may be in the future we forget the limitation. Just for a
> reminder.
> 
> Okay. Let's use something more practical like:
> 
> +* Make sure to exclude following unsupported cases before calling the
> function:
> +* 1) outrate > 8.125 * inrate
> +* 2) outrate > 16.125 * inrate

Ok.

[PATCH V5 0/3] Support more sample rate in asrc

[S.j. Wang]

Support more sample rate in asrc

Shengjiu Wang (3):
  ASoC: fsl_asrc: Fix the issue about unsupported rate
  ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function
  ASoC: fsl_asrc: Unify the supported input and output rate

Changes in v5
- fix the [1/24, 8]
- move fsl_asrc_sel_proc before setting

Changes in v4
- add patch to Fix the [8kHz, 30kHz] open set issue.

Changes in v3
- remove FSL_ASRC_RATES
- refine fsl_asrc_sel_proc according to comments

Changes in v2
- add more comments in code
- add commit "Unify the supported input and output rate"

 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH V5 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function

[S.j. Wang]

When we want to support more sample rate, for example 12kHz/24kHz
we need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which
is not flexible.

We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which can
give the pre-processing and post-processing options according to
the sample rate.

Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
index ea035c12a325..4675ea4e8204 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
@@ -26,24 +26,6 @@
 #define pair_dbg(fmt, ...) \
 	dev_dbg(&asrc_priv->pdev->dev, "Pair %c: " fmt, 'A' + index, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 
-/* Sample rates are aligned with that defined in pcm.h file */
-static const u8 process_option[][12][2] = {
-	/* 8kHz 11.025kHz 16kHz 22.05kHz 32kHz 44.1kHz 48kHz   64kHz   88.2kHz 96kHz   176kHz  192kHz */
-	{{0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},},	/* 5512Hz */
-	{{0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},},	/* 8kHz */
-	{{0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},},	/* 11025Hz */
-	{{1, 2}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},},	/* 16kHz */
-	{{1, 2}, {1, 2}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},},	/* 22050Hz */
-	{{1, 2}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},},	/* 32kHz */
-	{{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},},	/* 44.1kHz */
-	{{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {0, 2}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},},	/* 48kHz */
-	{{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 1}, {1, 2}, {0, 2}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0},},	/* 64kHz */
-	{{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1},},	/* 88.2kHz */
-	{{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1},},	/* 96kHz */
-	{{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1},},	/* 176kHz */
-	{{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1},},	/* 192kHz */
-};
-
 /* Corresponding to process_option */
 static int supported_input_rate[] = {
 	5512, 8000, 11025, 16000, 22050, 32000, 44100, 48000, 64000, 88200,
@@ -80,6 +62,51 @@
 static unsigned char *clk_map[2];
 
 /**
+ * Select the pre-processing and post-processing options
+ * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin
+ *
+ * inrate: input sample rate
+ * outrate: output sample rate
+ * pre_proc: return value for pre-processing option
+ * post_proc: return value for post-processing option
+ */
+static int fsl_asrc_sel_proc(int inrate, int outrate,
+			     int *pre_proc, int *post_proc)
+{
+	bool post_proc_cond2;
+	bool post_proc_cond0;
+
+	/* select pre_proc between [0, 2] */
+	if (inrate * 8 > 33 * outrate)
+		*pre_proc = 2;
+	else if (inrate * 8 > 15 * outrate) {
+		if (inrate > 152000)
+			*pre_proc = 2;
+		else
+			*pre_proc = 1;
+	} else if (inrate < 76000)
+		*pre_proc = 0;
+	else if (inrate > 152000)
+		*pre_proc = 2;
+	else
+		*pre_proc = 1;
+
+	/* Condition for selection of post-processing */
+	post_proc_cond2 = (inrate * 15 > outrate * 16 && outrate < 56000) ||
+			  (inrate > 56000 && outrate < 56000);
+	post_proc_cond0 = inrate * 23 < outrate * 8;
+
+	if (post_proc_cond2)
+		*post_proc = 2;
+	else if (post_proc_cond0)
+		*post_proc = 0;
+	else
+		*post_proc = 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
  * Request ASRC pair
  *
  * It assigns pair by the order of A->C->B because allocation of pair B,
@@ -239,6 +266,7 @@ static int fsl_asrc_config_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
 	u32 inrate, outrate, indiv, outdiv;
 	u32 clk_index[2], div[2];
 	int in, out, channels;
+	int pre_proc, post_proc;
 	struct clk *clk;
 	bool ideal;
 
@@ -377,11 +405,13 @@ static int fsl_asrc_config_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
 			   ASRCTR_IDRi_MASK(index) | ASRCTR_USRi_MASK(index),
 			   ASRCTR_IDR(index) | ASRCTR_USR(index));
 
+	fsl_asrc_sel_proc(inrate, outrate, &pre_proc, &post_proc);
+
 	/* Apply configurations for pre- and post-processing */
 	regmap_update_bits(asrc_priv->regmap, REG_ASRCFG,
 			   ASRCFG_PREMODi_MASK(index) |	ASRCFG_POSTMODi_MASK(index),
-			   ASRCFG_PREMOD(index, process_option[in][out][0]) |
-			   ASRCFG_POSTMOD(index, process_option[in][out][1]));
+			   ASRCFG_PREMOD(index, pre_proc) |
+			   ASRCFG_POSTMOD(index, post_proc));
 
 	return fsl_asrc_set_ideal_ratio(pair, inrate, outrate);
 }
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function

[Nicolin Chen]

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:35AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> When we want to support more sample rate, for example 12kHz/24kHz
> we need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
> sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which
> is not flexible.
> 
> We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which can
> give the pre-processing and post-processing options according to
> the sample rate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>

A couple of more small comments.

And please add this when you resend:
Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>

> + * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin

Since we have a ratio validation somewhere else, it's okay to
drop this line -- it may confuse people since the function no
longer checks these unsupported cases.

> +static int fsl_asrc_sel_proc(int inrate, int outrate,

I think "void" type should be just fine as we made sure there
is no unsupported cases running in this function.