From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C0DC10F03 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAE9C214AE for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RFKifiku" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AAE9C214AE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44pVzG3m48zDqP6 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 03:38:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=helgaas@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RFKifiku"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44pVxX3tFnzDqN1 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 03:36:47 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (odyssey.drury.edu [64.22.249.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02F66206BA; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:36:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1556041005; bh=0ywx4lbgLqdcOUJmTJLQ1S0sd6blYojEzZMGaehyCq4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RFKifikufVAAEiYElOfFEZNBmaOX2AaURO7CJBO43uVnIm7SiUToincr0CoU5SipS eq2M2g/oAiDcLtIuc216jiwUzJebwpsyrWM9ejkKSSdRE8ZRTqbu9nljumpqsQwuQ6 IfP1DjparUtNRl4DWKZkRDEo/m77cCe09UE43KGY= Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:36:44 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/63] Include linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs into Sphinx TOC tree Message-ID: <20190423173644.GA14616@google.com> References: <20190423162932.21428-1-changbin.du@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fenghua Yu , the arch/x86 maintainers , Jonathan Corbet , Linux PCI , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , Ingo Molnar , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev , Changbin Du Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 06:39:47PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 6:30 PM Changbin Du wrote: > > Hi Corbet and All, > > The kernel now uses Sphinx to generate intelligent and beautiful > > documentation from reStructuredText files. I converted all of the Linux > > ACPI/PCI/X86 docs to reST format in this serias. > > > > In this version I combined ACPI and PCI docs, and added new x86 docs > > conversion. > > I'm not sure if combining all three into one big patch series has been > a good idea, honestly. Yeah, if you post this again, I would find it easier to deal with if linux-pci only got the PCI-related things. 63 patches is a little too much for one series. Bjorn